Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928911›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

Socioeconomic status and use of obesogenic and anti-obesity medications in the United States: A population-based study.

Beini Lyu, Alex R Chang, Lesley A Inker, Elizabeth Selvin, Morgan E Grams, Jung-Im Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Approach to Obesity Treatment in Primary Care: A Review.JAMA internal medicine · 2024 · on this map
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beini LyuDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-600 (room 2-204), Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Alex R ChangKidney Health Research Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Lesley A InkerDivision of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth SelvinDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-600 (room 2-204), Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Morgan E GramsDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-600 (room 2-204), Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Jung-Im ShinDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2024 E. Monument Street, Suite 2-600 (room 2-204), Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Funding

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Second-line Therapy in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesK01DK121825 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHIN, JUNG-IM · 2019 to 2022
$615k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK121825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend the avoidance of medications that may cause weight gain (i.e., obesogenic medications) in individuals with overweight or obesity. Obesity disproportionately affects people with lower socioeconomic status (SES); however, it is unknown whether the use of obesogenic medications differs by SES. Methods: We included adults with overweight or obesity and used prescription medications from 2009-2018 of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We examined the associations between a composite measure of SES and use of obesogenic medications and anti-obesity medications. The composite SES included <high school education (1 point), household income below federal poverty level (1 point), no insurance (2 points), and public health insurance only (1 point). We defined 3 composite SES groups (0 [high], 1 [intermediate], and ≥2 points [low]). Findings: Among 10,673 US adults with overweight or obesity, 20.0% had low SES. Use of obesogenic medications was common (37.7%). Low (vs. high) SES was associated with greater obesogenic medication use, independent of demographic characteristics, prescription medication burden, and comorbidities (OR 1.3 [1.2-1.5]). Among 12,133 eligible participants, utilization of anti-obesity medications was very low overall (0.5%) and within all SES groups (low 0.27%, intermediate 0.71, and high 0.65%). Interpretation: Our findings highlight common and modifiable risk factors for obesity. Clinicians should screen patient medications for those that may cause weight gain and increase adoption of anti-obesity medications, especially among adults living in low SES. Funding: The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (R01DK115534, K24HL155861, and K01DK121825).

Indexed as

DisparitiesObesityObesogenic medicationsPharmacoequitySocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID35928911
PMCPMC9348594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.