ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Natural polymer-based scaffolds for soft tissue repair.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles From Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Drive Muscle and Neuronal Regeneration Through TNFα Modulation.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Fibrin scaffolds for angiogenesis in soft tissue models: a systematic review.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Integrated strategies in meniscus tissue engineering: from biomaterials to stem cell-driven regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mimicking Design Scaffolds Based on Nonwoven Biological Materials of Silk Cocoon for Soft Tissue Engineering at the Bone Interfacial Area: Structure, Morphology, and Performance Evaluation Based on In Vitro Testing, and Identification of Applied Biomaterials.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- The Immunologic Spectrum of Biostimulators and Its Clinical Importance.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- An In Silico Model to Examine the Interaction Between Implant Degradation and Fracture Healing Under Mechanical Loading.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Implantable Dental Barrier Membranes as Regenerative Medicine in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- IGFBP3 enhances adipose-derived stem cell function in soft tissue injury repair via ITGB1 and ERK pathway activation.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Article
- Polymer-Based Scaffolds as an Implantable Material in Regenerative Dentistry: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Polycaprolactone for Hard Tissue Regeneration: Scaffold Design and In Vivo Implications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Bone To Blood Flow: Tissue Engineering In Orthopedics - A Narrative Review.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Polymers and Biomaterials for Posterior Lamella of the Eyelid and the Lacrimal System.Polymers · 2024Review
- A Review on Polymers for Biomedical Applications on Hard and Soft Tissues and Prosthetic Limbs.Polymers · 2023Review
- Role of three-dimensional cell culture in therapeutics and diagnostics: an updated review.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023Review
- Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Decellularization of the human urethra for tissue engineering applications.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Biophysical cues of in vitro biomaterials-based artificial extracellular matrix guide cancer cell plasticity.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Biodegradable Polymer Electrospinning for Tendon Repairment.Polymers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft tissues such as skin, muscle, and tendon are easily damaged due to injury from physical activity and pathological lesions. For soft tissue repair and regeneration, biomaterials are often used to build scaffolds with appropriate structures and tailored functionalities that can support cell growth and new tissue formation. Among all types of scaffolds, natural polymer-based scaffolds attract much attention due to their excellent biocompatibility and tunable mechanical properties. In this comprehensive mini-review, we summarize recent progress on natural polymer-based scaffolds for soft tissue repair, focusing on clinical translations and materials design. Furthermore, the limitations and challenges, such as unsatisfied mechanical properties and unfavorable biological responses, are discussed to advance the development of novel scaffolds for soft tissue repair and regeneration toward clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.