Evidence mapPaperPMID 35929472Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Effect of Canagliflozin on Total Cardiovascular Burden in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis From the CREDENCE Trial.

Jing-Wei Li, Clare Arnott, Hiddo J L Heerspink, Qiang Li MBiostat, Christopher P Cannon, David C Wheeler, David M Charytan, Jennifer Barraclough, Gemma A Figtree, Rajiv Agarwal and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. EClinicalMedicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Jing-Wei LiThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.
Clare ArnottThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9370-9913
Hiddo J L HeerspinkThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3126-3730
Qiang Li MBiostatThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.
Christopher P CannonCardiovascular Division Brigham & Women's Hospital and Baim Institute for Clinical Research Boston MA.
David C WheelerThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0745-3478
David M CharytanNephrology Division NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Medical Center New York NY.
Jennifer BarracloughThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.
Gemma A FigtreeThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5080-6083
Rajiv AgarwalIndiana University School of Medicine and VA Medical Center Indianapolis IN.ORCID 0000-0001-8355-7100
George BakrisDepartment of Medicine University of Chicago Medicine Chicago IL.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-1267
Dick de ZeeuwDepartment Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen The Netherlands.
Tom GreeneDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences University of Utah Salt Lake City UT.
Adeera LevinDivision of Nephrology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC.
Carol PollockKolling Institute Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7167-6495
Hong ZhangRenal Division of Peking University First Hospital Beijing China.
Bernard ZinmanLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mt Sinai Hospital University of Toronto Toronto ON.
Kenneth W MahaffeyStanford Center for Clinical Research, Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA.
Vlado PerkovicThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-7620
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0490-7465
Meg J JardineThe George Institute for Global Health UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USNYU Langone Health · USPeking University · CNRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USRoyal North Shore Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor canagliflozin reduced the risk of first cardiovascular composite events in the CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the effect of canagliflozin on total (first and recurrent) cardiovascular events. Methods and Results The CREDENCE trial compared canagliflozin or matching placebo in 4401 patients with type 2 diabetes, albuminuria, and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to <90 mL/min per 1.73 m

Indexed as

CanagliflozinCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Renal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsCanagliflozinSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitorscanagliflozinchronic kidney diseasediabetesrecurrent cardiovascular event

Identifiers

PMID35929472
PMCPMC9496296
OpenAlexW4289868958

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.