Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35934958›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2022

Variation in communicative complexity in relation to social structure and organization in non-human primates.

Filippo Aureli, Colleen M Schaffner, Gabriele Schino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emotions and courtship help bonded pairs cooperate, but emotional agents are vulnerable to deceit.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Communicative roots of complex sociality and cognition: preface to the theme issue.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Filippo AureliInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Dr. Luis Castelazo Ayala, Xalapa, Veracruz 91190, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-013X
Colleen M SchaffnerPsychology Department, Adams State University, Alamosa, CO 81101, USA.
Gabriele SchinoIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00197 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5011-4896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communicative complexity relates to social complexity, as individuals in more complex social systems either use more signals or more complex signals than individuals living in less complex ones. Taking the individual group member's perspective, here we examine communicative complexity in relation to social complexity, which arises from two components of social systems: social structure and social organization. We review the concepts of social relationships and social complexity and evaluate their implications for communicative and cognitive complexity using examples from primate species. We focus on spider monkeys (

Indexed as

AtelinaeSocial BehaviorAnimalsCommunicationInterpersonal RelationsPrimatesSocial Structurecognitive complexitycommunicative complexitycommunicative signalfission–fusion dynamicssocial complexitysocial relationship

Identifiers

PMID35934958
PMCPMC9358317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.