ArticleGland surgery2022
A nomogram for survival prediction in 275,812 U.S. patients with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study based on the SEER database.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a SEER-derived prognostic nomogram for non-metastatic Asian breast cancer patients.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with triple-negative invasive ductal breast cancer: A SEER population-based study.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- A prognostic nomogram for predicting breast cancer survival based on mammography and AJCC staging.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Prognostic analysis of breast cancer in Xinjiang based on Cox proportional hazards model and two-step cluster method.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nomograms can assess the risk of clinicopathological features by quantifying the biological and clinical variables of cancer patients. However, the nomogram based on significant factors that influence the survival of breast cancer in a large population has been rarely explored. This study was to investigate the predictive effectiveness of a nomogram for the survival of patients with breast cancer. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of 275,812 breast cancer patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All patients aged ≥20 years in this retrospective cohort study were classified as two groups in a random manner, namely the training set (n=193,069) and validation set (n=82,743). The outcomes of our study were the 3- and 5-year survival of breast cancer. The potential predictors of cancer mortality were screened by univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. The nomogram was conducted based on the predictors. Harrell's concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curve was utilized to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. Results: The age at diagnosis, race, marital status, tumor size, first malignant primary indicator, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T stage, M stage, tumor grade, and number of malignant tumors were independent predictors for the death of patients with breast cancer. The C-indexes of the training set and the validation set were 0.782 and 0.778, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the nomogram for predicting the 3- and 5-year survival of breast cancer were 0.770 and 0.756, respectively. Furthermore, the C-index values of our nomogram were 0.816, 0.775, 0.773, 0.734, and 0.750 for predicting survival in Asian, White, Hispanic, American Indian, and Black populations, respectively. Conclusions: The nomogram may have predictive performance for predicting the 3- and 5-year survival of breast cancer patients, and future studies need to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.