Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35936738›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Application of artificial intelligence to pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Xi Chen, Ruibiao Fu, Qian Shao, Yan Chen, Qinghuang Ye, Sheng Li, Xiongxiong He, Jinhui Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xi ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ruibiao FuDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qian ShaoDepartment of Surgical Ward 1, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qinghuang YeDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Sheng LiCollege of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Xiongxiong HeCollege of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Jinhui ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide although substantial advancement has been made in its comprehensive treatment. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has allowed its clinical applications to expand remarkably in recent years. Diverse methods and algorithms are employed by AI to extrapolate new data from clinical records to aid in the treatment of PC. In this review, we will summarize AI's use in several aspects of PC diagnosis and therapy, as well as its limits and potential future research avenues. Methods: We examine the most recent research on the use of AI in PC. The articles are categorized and examined according to the medical task of their algorithm. Two search engines, PubMed and Google Scholar, were used to screen the articles. Results: Overall, 66 papers published in 2001 and after were selected. Of the four medical tasks (risk assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction), diagnosis was the most frequently researched, and retrospective single-center studies were the most prevalent. We found that the different medical tasks and algorithms included in the reviewed studies caused the performance of their models to vary greatly. Deep learning algorithms, on the other hand, produced excellent results in all of the subdivisions studied. Conclusions: AI is a promising tool for helping PC patients and may contribute to improved patient outcomes. The integration of humans and AI in clinical medicine is still in its infancy and requires the in-depth cooperation of multidisciplinary personnel.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)artificial neural network (ANN)future perspectivesmachine learning (ML)pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC)

Identifiers

PMID35936738
PMCPMC9353734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.