Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35937841›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI): current treatments and perinatal outcomes, a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Laurel Moar, Chloe Simela, Surabhi Nanda, Andreas Marnerides, Mudher Al-Adnani, Catherine Nelson-Piercy, Kypros H Nicolaides, Panicos Shangaris

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Understanding a Potential Role for the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Placenta-Mediated Pregnancy Complications.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurel MoarSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chloe SimelaSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Surabhi NandaSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andreas MarneridesDepartment of Histopathology, St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, United Kingdom.
Mudher Al-AdnaniDepartment of Histopathology, St. Thomas Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine Nelson-PiercySchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kypros H NicolaidesSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Panicos ShangarisSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHI) is a rare placental lesion with a high recurrence rate and poor perinatal outcomes. There are currently limited guidelines regarding the diagnosis of this condition in the index pregnancy and treatment where recurrence is suspected. Objective: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the perinatal outcomes of pregnancies affected by chronic histiocytic intervillositis and to what extent they can be improved with treatment. The secondary objective was to assess the relationship between CHI lesion severity and pregnancy loss. Methods: A systematic search of Ovid Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, PubMed, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar and CINAHL was carried out. Case reports, cohort, case-control and randomised controlled trials (RCT) detailing the perinatal outcomes of CHI pregnancies, both treated and untreated, were included. Results: No RCTs were identified. However, in a review population of 659 pregnancies, with additional 7 in case reports, CHI treatments included aspirin, prednisone, prednisolone, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), hydroxychloroquine and adalimumab. A descriptive synthesis of data found mixed results for treatments in relation to live birth, miscarriage and fetal growth restriction outcomes. Furthermore, quantitative synthesis of 38 pregnancies revealed a non-significant improvement in live birth rate with CHI targeted treatment (OR 1.79 [95% CI 0.33-9.61] (p=0.50), while meta-analysis of CHI severity in line with pregnancy loss, in a sample of 231 pregnancies, revealed lower odds of pregnancy loss with less severe lesions (OR: 0.17 [0.03-0.80], p=0.03). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis reinforce notions surrounding the insufficient evidence for CHI treatment. It also strengthens previous hypotheses detailing the positive association between CHI lesion severity and odds of pregnancy loss. Aspirin, LMWH, prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine and adalimumab are candidates with varying levels of weak to moderate evidence supporting their use. Further prospective research is required to obtain robust evidence pertaining to treatment safety and efficacy and optimal drug regimes. Systematic Review Registration: [website], identifier CRD42021237604.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousHydroxychloroquineAdalimumabAspirinFemaleHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansPrednisolonePregnancyAdalimumabAspirinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHydroxychloroquinePrednisoloneCHIintervillositisrecurrent miscarriagesmall gestation age (SGA)stillbirth

Identifiers

PMID35937841
PMCPMC9355722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.