Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938190›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Design optimization of powered ankle prosthesis to reduce peak power requirement.

Muhammad Bilal, Mohsin Rizwan, Hafiz Farhan Maqbool, Muhammad Ahsan, Ali Raza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad BilalHuman-Centered Robotics Lab, National Center of Robotics and Automation, 66914University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-7645
Mohsin RizwanHuman-Centered Robotics Lab, National Center of Robotics and Automation, 66914University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan.
Hafiz Farhan MaqboolHuman-Centered Robotics Lab, National Center of Robotics and Automation, 66914University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad AhsanHuman-Centered Robotics Lab, National Center of Robotics and Automation, 66914University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan.
Ali RazaHuman-Centered Robotics Lab, National Center of Robotics and Automation, 66914University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the prosthetic devices is to replicate the able-bodied angle-torque profile of a healthy human during locomotion. A lightweight and energy-efficient ankle joint is able to lower the actuator peak power and/or energy consumption per gait cycle, while adequately fulfilling the profile matching constraints. This study presents the design optimization of the prosthetic ankle joint containing an elastic element and actuator coupled with a rigid triangular part. The dimensions of the ankle joint triangular part were optimized to minimize actuator peak power and maximize spring energy within its elastic limits. As a result of series simulation tests, at 1.1 and 1.6 m/s walking speeds, the simulation of dorsi/plantar flexion shows up to 78.8% and 66.98% reduction in motor peak power compared to a direct drive system, respectively. Low power ankle-prosthetic device that closely matches the angle-torque profile of a healthy human's ankle, is one of the key parameters for the cost-effectiveness of lower limb prostheses.

Indexed as

AnkleArtificial LimbsBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansWalkingdesign optimizationkinematicspeak power reductionprosthetic ankle jointseries-elastic actuator

Identifiers

PMID35938190
PMCPMC10364942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.