Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35938207›Full record

Trial reportPost reproductive health2022

Effects of ultra-low dose hormone therapy on biochemical bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Lucia Costa-Paiva, Maria Celeste O Wender, Rogerio B Machado, Luciano M Pompei, Eliana A Nahas, Jorge Nahas-Neto, Sonia Y Del Debbio, Mariangela Badalotti, Achilles M Cruz

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Post reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The inflammatory clock: how cGAS-STING ticks in the aging ovary.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia Costa-PaivaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, 28132State University of Campinas-UNICAMP Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9088-6700
Maria Celeste O WenderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28124Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-UFRGS, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Rogerio B MachadoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 146840Jundiai School of Medicine, Jundiai, Brazil.
Luciano M PompeiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 125191ABC School of Medicine, Santo Andre, Brazil.
Eliana A NahasDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 154010Botucatu School of Medicine UNESP-Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Jorge Nahas-NetoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 154010Botucatu School of Medicine UNESP-Sao Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Sonia Y Del DebbioPaulista Center for Clinical Research-CEPIC, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mariangela BadalottiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 28102PUC-RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Achilles M CruzDepartment of Clinical Research, 70795Libbs Farmacêutica Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRCentro Paulista de Investigação Clinica · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRLibbs (Brazil) · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the effects of ultra-low-dose hormone therapy (Ultra-LD HT) with 17β-estradiol 0.5 mg and norethisterone acetate 0.1 mg (E2 0.5/NETA 0.1) versus placebo on bone turnover markers (BTM) in postmenopausal women. STUDY

designA multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed with 107 participants who received one tablet daily of E2 0.5/NETA 0.1 or placebo for 24-weeks. Bone formation markers-N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), and bone resorption markers-C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and N-telopeptide crosslinked of type I collagen (NTX) were assessed before and at 12 and 24-weeks of treatment.

resultsWomen treated with E2 0.5/NETA 0.1 had a significant reduction in the PINP marker from baseline (58.49 ± 21.12 μg/L) to week 12 (48.31 ± 20.99 μg/L) and week 24 (39.16 ± 16.50 μg/L). Placebo group, the PINP marker did not differ significantly. The analysis of the BSAP indicated a significant increase in the placebo group (13.8 ± 5.09 μg/L and 16.29 ± 4.3 μg/L, at baseline and week 24, respectively), whereas in the treatment group the values did not change. The analysis of the NTX marker showed a significant reduction only in the treatment group (43.21 ± 15.26 nM/mM and 33.89 ± 14.9 nM/mM, at baseline and week 24, respectively). CTX-I had a significant decrease in the treatment group from baseline (0.3 ± 0.16 ng/L) to week 12 (0.21 ± 0.14 ng/L) and week 24 (0.21 ± 0.12 ng/L).

conclusionWomen receiving E2 0.5/NETA 0.1 experienced reductions in bone resorption and formation markers, an expected effect during the anti-resorptive therapy, suggesting a protective bone effect with the Ultra-LD HT.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkersBone DensityBone RemodelingCollagen Type IDouble-Blind MethodEstradiolFemaleHumansNorethindrone AcetatePostmenopauseAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkersCollagen Type IEstradiolNorethindrone Acetatebone mineral densitybone turnover markerestrogenmenopauseultra-low-dose hormone therapy

Identifiers

PMID35938207
PMCPMC9500172
OpenAlexW4290267851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.