Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35945460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

Sexual dimorphism in shape and size of the neurocranium.

Diana H Toneva, Silviya Y Nikolova, Elena D Tasheva-Terzieva, Dora K Zlatareva, Nikolai E Lazarov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diana H TonevaDepartment of Anthropology and Anatomy, Institute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Anthropology with Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 25, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria. ditoneva@abv.bg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-9704
Silviya Y NikolovaDepartment of Anthropology and Anatomy, Institute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Anthropology with Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 25, 1113, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-0707
Elena D Tasheva-TerzievaDepartment of Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University, 1164, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3981-3848
Dora K ZlatarevaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-2278
Nikolai E LazarovDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3420-4346

Funding

Bulgarian National Science Fund КП-06-H51/4 - 11.11.2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex identification is a primary step in forensic analysis of skeletal remains. The accuracy of sex estimation methods greatly depends on the sexual dimorphism manifested by the target anatomical region. The study aims to evaluate the sexual dimorphism in shape and size of the neurocranium and to compare the potential of shape and size of different cranial regions to classify correctly the male and female crania. The study was carried out on computed tomography images of 373 Bulgarian adults (161 males and 212 females). Three-dimensional coordinates of 32 landmarks were acquired. The landmarks were arranged in 4 configurations: neurocranium, frontal bone, parietotemporal region, and occipital bone. For each configuration, the presence of significant sex differences in shape and size was tested. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to explore the shape variation. The classification power of size and shape was tested using discriminant analysis and k-means clustering. The neurocranium shows significant sex differences in shape and size. The parietotemporal region is the most dimorphic neurocranial part in size and the frontal bone is the most differing one in shape. The size of the parietotemporal region and frontal bone classifies correctly more than 80% of the crania. The discrimination ability based on shape is rather low as the highest values of about 70% are obtained for the frontal and occipital bone. The PCA plots show large overlapping of the male and female crania. It can be inferred that the sex-specific size differences in the neurocranium are more important than the shape differences.

Indexed as

Sex Determination by SkeletonAdultDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleForensic AnthropologyFrontal BoneHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisSex CharacteristicsSkull3D landmarksComputed tomographyGeometric morphometricsNeurocraniumSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.