SynthesisBMJ global health2022
Preconception and periconception interventions to prevent low birth weight, small for gestational age and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutrition and reproductive potential of women in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Role of preconception nutrition supplements in maternal anemia and intrauterine growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of a package of health, nutrition, psychosocial support, and WaSH interventions delivered during preconception, pregnancy, and early childhood periods on birth outcomes and on linear growth at 24 months of age: factorial, individually randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Article
- Preconceptual care reduces risk of spontaneous preterm birth for select high-risk populations: A prospective study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Poverty and Social Disadvantage in Women and Men and Fertility Outcomes.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Preconception malnutrition among women and girls in south Asia: prevalence, determinants, and association with pregnancy and birth outcomes.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Review
- Bridging the gaps: advancing preconception nutrition in South Asia through evidence, policy, and action.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Review
- Effects of preconception nutrition interventions on pregnancy and birth outcomes in South Asia: a systematic review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Review
- Article
- Integrated multisectoral interventions to mitigate the risk of low birth weight in low- and middle-income country settings: Implementation considerations for programs from a WHO expert consultation.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Implementation of preconception care for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes in rural and tribal areas of Nashik District, India.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Like mother like daughter, the role of low human capital in intergenerational cycles of disadvantage: the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study.Frontiers in global women's health · 2024Article
- Advances in DNA methylation of imprinted genes and folic acid regulation of growth and development.Epigenomics · 2024Review
- Priority nutrients to address malnutrition and diet-related diseases in Australia and New Zealand.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- [Association between periconceptional supplementation of folic acid or multiple-micronutrients containing folic acid and preterm delivery in women].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow birth weight (LBW), including preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA), contributes a significant global health burden. We aimed to summarise current evidence on the effect of preconception and periconception interventions on LBW, SGA and PTB.
methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and WHO Global Index Medicus for randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies published by 28 November 2020, which assessed interventions delivered in preconception and periconception or preconception and pregnancy. Primary outcomes were LBW, SGA and PTB. Studies were categorised by intervention type and delivery during preconception and periconception or during preconception and pregnancy. Estimates were pooled using fixed-effects or random-effects restricted maximum likelihood method meta-analyses. Quality of evidence for primary outcomes was assessed using the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
resultsWe included 58 studies. Twenty-eight studies examined nutrition interventions (primarily micronutrient or food supplementation). Thirty studies (including one reporting a nutrition intervention) provided health interventions (general preconception health, early adverse pregnancy outcome prevention, non-communicable disease and infectious disease prevention and management). One study assessed a social intervention (reproductive planning). Studies varied in terms of specific interventions, including delivery across preconception or pregnancy, resulting in few studies for any single comparison. Overall, the evidence was generally very uncertain regarding the impact of any intervention on LBW, SGA and PTB. Additionally, preconception and periconception nutritional supplementation containing folic acid was associated with reduced risk of birth defects (10 studies, N=3 13 312, risk ratio: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.24 to 0.55), I
conclusionWe found a paucity of evidence regarding the impact of preconception and periconception interventions on LBW, SGA and PTB. Further research on a wider range of interventions is required to clearly ascertain their potential effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020220915).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.