Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35951182›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Somatic Embryogenesis in Pines.

Ander Castander-Olarieta, Paloma Moncaleán, Itziar A Montalbán

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ander Castander-OlarietaDepartment of Forestry, NEIKER-BRTA. Arkaute Centre, Álava, Spain.
Paloma MoncaleánDepartment of Forestry, NEIKER-BRTA. Arkaute Centre, Álava, Spain.
Itziar A MontalbánDepartment of Forestry, NEIKER-BRTA. Arkaute Centre, Álava, Spain. imontalban@neiker.eus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the different in vitro culture techniques, somatic embryogenesis has been one of the most important developments for plant tissue culture; it has enabled mass propagation and the development of biotechnological tools to enhance the productivity and quality of plantation forestry. This propagation technique together with cryopreservation is the base of multivarietal forestry.The development of somatic embryogenesis in forest trees dates from 1985, and in the last years several studies have focused on the development and optimization of the conifer somatic embryogenesis process to make it more efficient in terms of both the quantity and the characteristics of the plants obtained. However, these advances are not sufficiently refined to be implemented commercially for many Pinus spp. due to the high cost of the process derived from hand labor. Nowadays, trying to add value to the plants produced to compensate the high costs of the process, different studies are being developed in order to obtain Pinus somatic plants with better adaptation to environmental stresses prompted by the current situation of climate change.In this chapter, a summary of the recent somatic embryogenesis systems developed to achieve Pinus spp. high quality plants is presented.

Indexed as

PinusPlant Somatic Embryogenesis TechniquesEmbryonic DevelopmentPlantsTreesAbiotic stressConiferCryopreservationForest BiotechnologyMicropropagationSomatic Embryos

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.