Observational studyLancet (London, England)2022
Clinical presentation and virological assessment of confirmed human monkeypox virus cases in Spain: a prospective observational cohort study.
Observational study in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 350 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
European Randomised Clinical Trial on mPOX Infection
Understanding MPXV Viral Clearance in Mpox Patients and Evaluating Transmission Dynamics of MPXV and Mpox Vaccine Effectiveness in West Africa : The Republic of Guinea
Who cites it
350 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 668 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of mpox infection among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Pooled it
- Epidemiological characteristics of monkeypox virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Secondary attack rates after mpox exposure in multiple settings during the 2022-2024 pandemic: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Hospitalization rate and patterns of clinical reasons among Mpox-confirmed cases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection on mpox patients during the 2022 global outbreak: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on comparative observational studies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Routes of transmission of mpox by virus clade and geographic distribution: A systematic review.Journal of infection and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Global epidemiology, viral evolution, and public health responses: a systematic review on Mpox (1958-2024).Journal of global health · 2025Pooled it
- Atypical mucocutaneous manifestations of MPOX: A systematic review.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Decoding mpox: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the transmission and severity parameters of the 2022-2023 global outbreak.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- The epidemiological and clinical differences between patients with mpox and patients without mpox among suspected cases during the recent global mpox outbreaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of Peruvian patients with mpox: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Prevention of sexual transmission of mpox: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of approaches.Infectious diseases (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- A global systematic evidence review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of the 2022 Mpox outbreaks.Infection · 2024Pooled it
- Mpox gastrointestinal manifestations: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- Viral Loads in Skin Samples of Patients with Monkeypox Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Viruses · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of a field-deployable iiPCR platform and viral load dynamics of MPXV Clade IIb in a cohort with high prevalence of HIV.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Seminal fluid enhances monkeypox virus infection via amyloidogenic fibrils.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- A three-generation mpox cluster in Chongqing, 2024: transmission chain investigation and phylogenetic characterization.Infection · 2026Article
- Understanding Mpox Knowledge, Communication, and Care Engagement Among Black and Latino Gay and Bisexual Men.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
- History of sexually transmitted infections among mpox cases in the 2022 outbreak in Spain.HIV medicine · 2026Article
290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
38 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn May, 2022, several European countries reported autochthonous cases of monkeypox, which rapidly spread globally. Early reports suggest atypical presentations. We aimed to investigate clinical and virological characteristics of cases of human monkeypox in Spain.
methodsThis multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study was done in three sexual health clinics in Madrid and Barcelona, Spain. We enrolled all consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed monkeypox from May 11 to June 29, 2022. Participants were offered lesion, anal, and oropharynx swabs for PCR testing. Participant data were collected by means of interviews conducted by dermatologists or specialists in sexually transmitted infections and were recorded using a standard case report form. Outcomes assessed in all participants with a confirmed diagnosis were demographics, smallpox vaccination, HIV status, exposure to someone with monkeypox, travel, mass gathering attendance, risk factors for sexually transmitted infections, sexual behaviour, signs and symptoms on first presentation, virological results at multiple body sites, co-infection with other sexually transmitted pathogens, and clinical outcomes 14 days after the initial presentation. Clinical outcomes were followed up until July 13, 2022.
findings181 patients had a confirmed monkeypox diagnosis and were enrolled in the study. 166 (92%) identified as gay men, bisexual men, or other men who have sex with men (MSM) and 15 (8%) identified as heterosexual men or heterosexual women. Median age was 37·0 years (IQR 31·0-42·0). 32 (18%) patients reported previous smallpox vaccination, 72 (40%) were HIV-positive, eight (11%) had a CD4 cell count less than 500 cells per μL, and 31 (17%) were diagnosed with a concurrent sexually transmitted infection. Median incubation was 7·0 days (IQR 5·0-10·0). All participants presented with skin lesions; 141 (78%) participants had lesions in the anogenital region, and 78 (43%) in the oral and perioral region. 70 (39%) participants had complications requiring treatment: 45 (25%) had a proctitis, 19 (10%) had tonsillitis, 15 (8%) had penile oedema, six (3%) an abscess, and eight (4%) had an exanthem. Three (2%) patients required hospital admission. 178 (99%) of 180 swabs from skin lesions collected tested positive, as did 82 (70%) of 117 throat swabs. Viral load was higher in lesion swabs than in pharyngeal specimens (mean cycle threshold value 23 [SD 4] vs 32 [6], absolute difference 9 [95% CI 8-10]; p<0·0001). 108 (65%) of 166 MSM reported anal-receptive sex. MSM who engaged in anal-receptive sex presented with proctitis (41 [38%] of 108 vs four [7%] of 58, absolute difference 31% [95% CI 19-44]; p<0·0001) and systemic symptoms before the rash (67 [62%] vs 16 [28%], absolute difference 34% [28-62]; p<0·0001) more frequently than MSM who did not engage in anal-receptive sex. 18 (95%) of 19 participants with tonsillitis reported practising oral-receptive sex. The median time from onset of lesions to formation of a dry crust was 10 days (IQR 7-13).
interpretationIn our cohort, monkeypox caused genital, perianal, and oral lesions and complications including proctitis and tonsillitis. Because of the variability of presentations, clinicians should have a low threshold for suspicion of monkeypox. Lesion swabs showed the highest viral loads, which, combined with the history of sexual exposure and the distribution of lesions, suggests close contact is probably the dominant transmission route in the current outbreak.
fundingNone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.