Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35955074›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Manipulation under Anesthesia versus Non-Surgical Treatment for Patients with Frozen Shoulder Contracture Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Mattia Salomon, Chiara Pastore, Filippo Maselli, Mauro Di Bari, Raffaello Pellegrino, Fabrizio Brindisino

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High satisfaction rate and range of motion can be expected in frozen shoulder after awake manipulation with brachial plexus block.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mattia SalomonDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Roma "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-4236
Chiara PastoreDepartment of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Roma "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Filippo MaselliDepartment of Human Neurosciences, University of Roma "Sapienza", 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-9975
Mauro Di BariResearch Unit of Medicine of Aging, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5514-0524
Raffaello PellegrinoAntalgic Mini-Invasive and Rehab-Outpatients Unit, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5874-0376
Fabrizio BrindisinoDepartment of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, "Cardarelli Hospital", 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8950-8203
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) compared to other non-surgical therapeutic strategies for patients with frozen shoulder contracture syndrome (FSCS). Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted. A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane Central Library and Scopus. Only randomized controlled trials were included and assessed for critical appraisal through the Cochrane Collaborations tools. Results: Five randomized controlled trials were included. The overall risk of bias (RoB) was high in 4 out of 5 of the included studies. MUA was found to be not superior in terms of reduction of pain and improvement of function when compared to cortisone injections with hydrodilatation (mean regression coefficient MUA −2.77 vs. injection −2.75; 95% CI (−1.11 to 1.15)) and home exercise (mean difference 95% CI: 0.2 (−0.64 to 1.02)) in the short term (3 months), and cortisone injections with hydrodilatation (mean regression coefficient MUA 3.13 vs. injection 3.23; 95% CI (−0.90 to 1.11)) in the long term (>6 months). Moreover, if compared to structured physiotherapy, MUA highlighted a higher Oxford Shoulder Score at final 1-year follow up (mean difference 95% CI: 1.05 (−1.28 to 3.39); p = 0.38). Similar results were obtained for disability, with statistically no significant long-term (>12 months) differences between MUA and home exercise (mean difference 95% CI: 0 (−3.2 to 3.2)) or structured physiotherapy (mean difference 95% CI: −0.50 (−5.70 to 4.70); p = 0.85)). Only two trials reported adverse events. Conclusions: This review suggested that limited and inconsistent evidence currently exists on the efficacy of MUA compared to other non-surgical strategies in the management of patients with FSCS. Future research should focus on clinical trials with higher methodological quality.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaBursitisContractureCortisoneHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesCortisoneadhesive capsulitisfrozen shoulderfrozen shoulder contracture syndromemanipulation under anesthesiaphysiotherapysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35955074
PMCPMC9368476
OpenAlexW4290599409

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.