Evidence mapPaperPMID 35955942Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

The Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics in Non-Alcoholic Fat Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH): A Systematic Review.

Rodrigo Zamignan Carpi, Sandra M Barbalho, Katia Portero Sloan, Lucas Fornari Laurindo, Heron Fernando Gonzaga, Paulo Cesar Grippa, Tereza L Menegucci Zutin, Raul J S Girio, Cláudia Sampaio Fonseca Repetti, Cláudia Rucco Penteado Detregiachi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of interventions with live combinedFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo Zamignan CarpiDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Sandra M BarbalhoDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5035-876X
Katia Portero SloanTexas Institute for Kidney and Endocrine Disorders, Lufkin, TX 75904, USA.
Lucas Fornari LaurindoDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3159-0982
Heron Fernando GonzagaDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Cesar GrippaPostgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Tereza L Menegucci ZutinDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Raul J S GirioDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Cláudia Sampaio Fonseca RepettiDepartment of Animal Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Cláudia Rucco Penteado DetregiachiPostgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Patrícia C Santos BuenoDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Eliana de Souza Bastos Mazuqueli PereiraPostgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo de Alvares GoulartPostgraduate Program in Structural and Functional Interactions in Rehabilitation, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Jesselina Francisco Dos Santos HaberDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Marília (UNIMAR), Avenida Hygino Muzzy Filho, 1001, Marilia 17525-902, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de Marília · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Marília · BRLankenau Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications in the microbiota caused by environmental and genetic reasons can unbalance the intestinal homeostasis, deregulating the host's metabolism and immune system, intensifying the risk factors for the development and aggravation of non-alcoholic fat liver disease (NAFLD). The use of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics have been considered a potential and promising strategy to regulate the gut microbiota and produce beneficial effects in patients with liver conditions. For this reason, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were consulted, and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines were followed. The clinical trials used in this study demonstrated that gut microbiota interventions could improve a wide range of markers of inflammation, glycemia, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, obesity, liver injury (decrease of hepatic enzymes and steatosis and fibrosis). Although microbiota modulators do not play a healing role, they can work as an important adjunct therapy in pathological processes involving NAFLD and its spectrums, either by improving the intestinal barrier or by preventing the formation of toxic metabolites for the liver or by acting on the immune system.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseProbioticsSynbioticsHumansLiverPrebioticsPrebioticsmicrobiotanon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)prebioticprobioticsymbiotic

Identifiers

PMID35955942
PMCPMC9369010
OpenAlexW4295725820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.