Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35956037›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Protective Effects of BNT162b2 Vaccination on Aerobic Capacity Following Mild to Moderate SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study Israel.

Yair Blumberg, Michael Edelstein, Kamal Abu Jabal, Ron Golan, Neta Tuvia, Yuval Perets, Musa Saad, Tatyana Levinas, Dabbah Saleem, Zeev Israeli and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yair BlumbergRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Michael EdelsteinRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7323-0806
Kamal Abu JabalRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2463-7105
Ron GolanRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Neta TuviaRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Yuval PeretsAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 1311502, Israel.
Musa SaadRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Tatyana LevinasRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Dabbah SaleemRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Zeev IsraeliRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Abu Raya AlaaRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Gabby Elbaz GreenerAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 1311502, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1922-9174
Anat AmitalRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Majdi HalabiRivka Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Bar-Ilan University · ILRebecca Sieff Hospital · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients previously infected with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may experience post-acute adverse health outcomes, known as long COVID. The most reported symptoms are fatigue, headache and attention/concentration issues, dyspnea and myalgia. In addition, reduced aerobic capacity has been demonstrated in both mild and moderate COVID-19 patients. It is unknown whether COVID-19 vaccination mitigates against reduced aerobic capacity. Our aim was to compare the aerobic capacity of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Individuals aged 18 to 65 years with laboratory-confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were invited to Ziv Medical Centre, Israel, three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We compared individuals unvaccinated at the time of infection to those vaccinated in terms of aerobic capacity, measured using symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Results: We recruited 28 unvaccinated and 22 vaccinated patients. There were no differences in baseline demographic and pulmonary function testing (PFT) parameters. Compared with unvaccinated individuals, those vaccinated had higher V’O2/kg at peak exercise and at the anaerobic threshold. The V’O2/kg peak in the unvaccinated group was 83% of predicted vs. 100% in the vaccinated (p < 0.002). At the anaerobic threshold (AT), vaccinated individuals had a higher V’O2/kg than those unvaccinated. Conclusions: Vaccinated individuals had significantly better exercise performance. Compared with vaccinated individuals, a higher proportion of those unvaccinated performed substantially worse than expected on CPET. These results suggest that vaccination at the time of infection is associated with better aerobic capacity following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

aerobic capacityCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID35956037
PMCPMC9369692
OpenAlexW4289177538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.