ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Bioinformatics evaluation of a novel angiogenesis related genes-based signature for predicting prognosis and therapeutic efficacy in patients with gastric cancer.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Origin, Classification, Tumorigenicity, and Targeting for Cancer Therapy.MedComm · 2025Review
- Identification of a novel apoptosis-related genes signature to improve gastric cancer prognosis prediction.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Anoikis patterns via machine learning strategy and experimental verification exhibit distinct prognostic and immune landscapes in melanoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTumor angiogenesis plays a pivotal role in the development and metastasis of tumors. This study aimed to elucidate the association between angiogenesis-related genes (ARGs) and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC).
methodsTranscriptomics and clinical data of GC samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as the training group and those from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, including GSE26253, GSE26091 and GSE66229) as the validation groups. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was performed for gene set enrichment analysis on the gene set of angiogenesis and divided patients into high- or low-ARG group. Subsequently, to improve the availability of the ARG signature, a ARGs subtype predictor was then constructed by integrating of four machine learning methods, including support vector machine (SVM), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, Random Forest and Boruta (RFB) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the performance of prognosis prediction. The EPIC and xCELL method were used to calculate the profile of tumor-infiltrated immune cells.
resultsThe expression levels of a total of 36 ARGs that correlated with the survival of patients with GC were identified and utilized to establish an ARG-related prognosis signature. The area under the curve for predicting overall survival (OS) in the training group at the 1-, 3- and 5-year was 0.61, 0.64 and 0.76, respectively, and this was further validated using three independent GEO datasets. Moreover, the ARG signatures were significantly correlated with cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and GC patients that exhibited both high ARG expression level and matrix CAFs level had the most inferior outcomes. The multiple machine learning algorithms were applied to establish a 10-gene ARG subtype predictor, and notably, a high ARG-subtype predictor score was associated with reduced efficacy of immunotherapy, and potential anti-HER2 or FGFR4 therapy, but an increased sensitivity to anti-angiogenesis-related therapy.
conclusionThe novel ARGs-based classification may act as a potential prognostic predictor for GC and be used as a guidance for clinicians in selecting potential responders for immunotherapy and targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35958480PMC9360876What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.