Evidence mapPaperPMID 35958822Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2022

Scientific Evidence of Traditional Chinese Exercise (Qigong) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Hongshuo Shi, Ting Liu, Chengda Dong, Kun Zhen, Yuxuan Wang, Pengjun Liu, Guomin Si, Lei Wang, Min Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongshuo ShiShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Ting LiuShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-6283
Chengda DongShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7369-9201
Kun ZhenShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Yuxuan WangShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Pengjun LiuShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Guomin SiShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Lei WangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-0705
Min WangShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-0099
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As a traditional Chinese exercise, Qigong has potential benefits for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This overview is aimed at assessing the existing evidence for the intervention of Qigong in COPD so as to provide scientific guidance for clinical decision-making. Methods: The systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of Qigong for the treatment of COPD were obtained from 7 electronic databases with the search date set at April 5, 2022. Two researchers independently assessed the methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality for the included SRs/MAs using the following tools: the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020), and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: A total of 13 SRs/MAs were included in this overview. All SRs/MAs assessed by AMSTAR-2 had more than one critical defect, so all SR/MAs were rated very low. Regarding the assessment of reporting quality, the results of PRISMA 2020 showed that none of the SRs/MAs were fully reported. In addition, the results of the GRADE assessment of the quality of evidence indicated that only 3 outcomes were rated as high quality across all SRs/MAs. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that Qigong is effective and safe for the management of patients with COPD. However, the high risk of bias in the original clinical studies and the low quality of the SRs/MAs reduced the reliability of the results.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQigongChinaHumansReproducibility of ResultsResearch Report

Identifiers

PMID35958822
PMCPMC9363203
OpenAlexW4289520739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.