Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35959647›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of work exposures and health2022

Assessment of Physical Work Demands of Home Care Workers in Norway: An Observational Study Using Wearable Sensor Technology.

Svein O Tjøsvoll, Øystein Wiggen, Victor Gonzalez, Trine M Seeberg, Skender Elez Redzovic, Ingeborg Frostad Liaset, Andreas Holtermann, Marius Steiro Fimland

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of work exposures and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: A prospective cohort study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Svein O TjøsvollDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4844-2612
Øystein WiggenHealth Research, SINTEF DIGITAL, SINTEF AS, Trondheim, Norway.
Victor GonzalezSmart Sensor Systems, SINTEF DIGITAL, SINTEF AS, Oslo, Norway.
Trine M SeebergSmart Sensor Systems, SINTEF DIGITAL, SINTEF AS, Oslo, Norway.
Skender Elez RedzovicDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ingeborg Frostad LiasetDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Andreas HoltermannNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lerso Parkalle, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marius Steiro FimlandDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSINTEF · NONational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHigh physical work demands are believed to be partly responsible for the high sickness absence among home care workers, but no studies have assessed their physical work demands using precise device-based measurements. Hence, the objective of this observational study was to assess physical work demands in home care, using wearable sensors.

methodsFrom six home care units in a large municipality in Norway, 114 of 195 eligible home care workers filled in a questionnaire, a diary about work hours, and wore five accelerometers, and a heart rate sensor for up to six consecutive workdays.

resultsOn average, the homecare workers spent 50% of the working hours sitting, 25.2% standing, 11.4% moving, 8.3% walking fast, 1.9% walking slow, 1.2% stair-climbing, 0.3% cycling, and 0.05% running. We found the following exposures to demanding postures: arm-elevation in an upright body position ≥30° was 36.7%, ≥60° was 4.1%, and ≥90°was 0.5%; forward trunk inclination in an upright body position ≥30° was 9.9%, ≥60° was 4%, and ≥90° was 1%; and for kneeling it was 0.8%. We found the average cardiovascular load (%heart rate reserve) during work to be 28%. There was considerable individual variation in these physical exposures at work.

conclusionsThis study presents precise information on various physical work demands of home care workers in Norway. Home care workers spent on average half the workday sitting and the remaining time in various occupational physical activities. Presently, few device-based exposure limits have been proposed for acceptable amounts of occupational physical exposures, but the level of arm-elevation, forward trunk inclination, and the considerable variation of physical workloads among home care workers, indicate that preventive measures should be taken.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesOccupational ExposureWearable Electronic DevicesHumansPostureTechnologyaccelerometryergonomicsheart rate monitorhuman factorsmanual laboroccupational health and safetyoccupational physical activityphysical exposures

Identifiers

PMID35959647
PMCPMC9664225
OpenAlexW4291152090

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.