Evidence mapPaperPMID 35964124Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022

Patterns and determinants of adherence to resistance and endurance training during cancer treatment in the Phys-Can RCT.

Hannah L Brooke, Anne-Sophie Mazzoni, Laurien M Buffart, Sveinung Berntsen, Karin Nordin, Ingrid Demmelmaier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02473003 (Physical Training and Cancer- Effects and Understanding of Mechanisms for Prevent and Minimizing Cancer Related Fatigue, Improve Quality of Life and Disease Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02473003 naunknown statusnot on this map

Physical Training and Cancer- Effects and Understanding of Mechanisms for Prevent and Minimizing Cancer Related Fatigue, Improve Quality of Life and Disease Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2015 to 2025Enrolled600ConditionsBreast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Prostate CancerArmshigh intensity exercise, low/medium intensity exercise, Behavioral medicine strategies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. What works to engage cancer patients with fatigue in exercise: a scoping review of RCT-based interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah L BrookeDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anne-Sophie MazzoniDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Laurien M BuffartDepartment of Physiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sveinung BerntsenDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Karin NordinDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ingrid DemmelmaierDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Ingrid.demmelmaier@pubcare.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge regarding adherence is necessary to improve the specificity of exercise interventions during cancer treatment. We aimed to determine adherence to resistance and endurance training interventions in parallel; identify subgroups with similar adherence characteristics; and examine determinants of these subgroups.

methodsIn the Phys-Can randomised controlled trial, participants (n = 577, 81% women, mean(SD) age 59(12) years, and 50% with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m

resultsWe found a positive curvilinear correlation between adherence to resistance and endurance training overall. A similar correlation was seen for adherence to frequency of resistance vs. endurance training in the HI group. In the HI group, adherence to resistance training intensity and time was > 80% for almost all participants. For endurance training adherence ranged from 0 to 100% for each of the FITT principles. Three clusters were identified, representing low, mixed, and high adherence to resistance and endurance training overall. Participants with higher age (Relative risk ratio [95% CI]; LMI: 0.86[0.77-0.96], HI: 0.83[0.74-0.93]), no behaviour change support (LMI: 0.11[0.02-0.56], HI: 0.20[0.05-0.85]), higher cardiorespiratory fitness (LMI: 0.81[0.69-0.94], HI: 0.80[0.69-0.92]), more fatigue (according to the reduced activity subscale of the MFI questionnaire) (LMI: 0.48[0.31-0.73], HI: 0.69[0.52-0.93]) or higher quality of life (LMI: 0.95[0.90-1.00], HI: 0.93[0.88-0.98]) were less likely to be in the low than the high adherence cluster whether randomised to LMI or HI training. Other determinants were specific to those randomised to LMI or HI training.

conclusionsIn an exercise intervention during cancer treatment, adherence to resistance and endurance training were positively correlated. Personalisation of interventions and additional support for some subgroups of participants may improve adherence. Trial registration NCT02473003 (clinicaltrials.gov, Registered 16/06/2015).

Indexed as

AdherenceCancerDeterminantsEndurance trainingExerciseFITT principlesPatternsResistance training

Identifiers

PMID35964124
PMCPMC9375909

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.