ReviewCurrent research in immunology2022
Nature of viruses and pandemics: Coronaviruses.
Review in Current research in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interaction of coronavirus E protein with BRD2 plays important regulatory roles in viral replication and induction of pro-inflammatory response.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- IFITM3 deficiency drives SARS-CoV-2 adaptation while preserving variant-specific traits.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Innate immune control of influenza virus interspecies adaptation via IFITM3.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Polyvalent Nano-Lectin Potently Neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by Targeting Glycans on the Viral Spike Protein.JACS Au · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronaviruses (CoVs) have the largest genome among RNA viruses and store large amounts of information without genome integration as they replicate in the cell cytoplasm. The replication of the virus is a continuous process, whereas the transcription of the subgenomic mRNAs is a discontinuous one, involving a template switch, which resembles a high frequency recombination mechanism that may favor virus genome variability. The origin of the three deadly human CoVs SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 are zoonotic events. SARS-CoV-2 has incorporated in its spike protein a furine proteolytic site that facilitates the activation of the virus in any tissue, making this CoV strain highly polytropic and pathogenic. Using MERS-CoV as a model, a propagation-deficient RNA replicon was generated by removing E protein gene (essential for viral morphogenesis and involved in virulence), and accessory genes 3, 4a, 4b and 5 (responsible for antagonism of the innate immune response) to attenuate the virus: MERS-CoV-Δ[3,4a,4b,5,E]. This RNA replicon is strongly attenuated and elicits sterilizing protection after a single immunization in transgenic mice with the receptor for MERS-CoV, making it a promising vaccine candidate for this virus and an interesting platform for vector-based vaccine development. A strategy could be developed for the design of RNA replicon vaccines for other human pathogenic coronaviruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.