Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35968107›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Cacao agroforestry systems beyond the stigmas: Biotic and abiotic stress incidence impact.

Yeirme Y Jaimes-Suárez, Albert S Carvajal-Rivera, Donald A Galvis-Neira, Fabricio E L Carvalho, Jairo Rojas-Molina

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yeirme Y Jaimes-SuárezCentro de Investigación La Suiza, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA, Rionegro, Colombia.
Albert S Carvajal-RiveraCentro de Investigación La Suiza, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA, Rionegro, Colombia.
Donald A Galvis-NeiraCentro de Investigación La Suiza, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA, Rionegro, Colombia.
Fabricio E L CarvalhoCentro de Investigación La Suiza, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA, Rionegro, Colombia.
Jairo Rojas-MolinaCentro de Investigación La Suiza, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-AGROSAVIA, Rionegro, Colombia.
Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low technological knowledge in production chains, global climate change, and misinformation are concrete threats to food security. In addition, these combined threats also trigger ecological instability in megadiverse areas of the world, especially in some cacao-producing countries in South America, where this crop plays an important socio-economic role, even being used to replace illicit crops. Accordingly, the use of agroforestry systems approaches has emerged as a good alternative to maintain productivity, add high-value commodities to producers, and provide important ecosystem services for sustainable agriculture. However, limitations associated with the competition for resources between the species composing the system, and the higher incidence of some diseases, have led many producers to abandon this strategy, opting for monoculture. In this review, we seek to gather the main information available in the literature, aiming to answer the question: what is the real scientific evidence that supports the benefits and harms of adopting agroforestry systems in cacao production? We seek to make critical scrutiny of the possible negative effects of certain associations of the agroforestry system with biotic and abiotic stress in cacao. Here, we review the possible competition for light and nutrients and discuss the main characteristics to be sought in cacao genotypes to optimize these inter-specific relationships. In addition, we review the research advances that show the behavior of the main cacao diseases (Witch's broom disease, frosty pod rot, black pod rot) in models of agroforestry systems contrasted with monoculture, as well as the optimization of agronomic practices to reduce some of these stresses. This compendium, therefore, sheds light on a major gap in establishing truly sustainable agriculture, which has been treated much more from the perspective of negative stigma than from the real technological advantages that can be combined to the benefit of a balanced ecosystem with generating income for farmers.

Indexed as

AFSblack pod rotfrosty pod rotlight use efficiencywater use efficiencywitch’s broom disease

Identifiers

PMID35968107
PMCPMC9366013
OpenAlexW4288446472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.