ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2023
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: effect of heat inactivation of patient's serum on functional flow cytometric assay results.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeat inactivation of a patient's sample is not systematically performed in the diagnostics of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Some authors recommend that the patient's sample is heat-inactivated to avoid the effect of thrombin on platelet activation in a functional assay. Others do not find this additional step essential or even advise against it. MATERIAL AND
methodsAn enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry-based functional assay with CD62P as a marker of platelet activation were performed. Forty-seven patients with suspected HIT and three healthy controls were included in the study. Each serum sample was divided into two aliquots: one was heat-inactivated and the other was not. Both aliquots were tested in parallel using the same donor platelets from four randomly selected individuals. We designed an index of platelet activation for both protocols to assess platelet activation in the assay and to compare the results.
resultsWe observed a higher percentage of platelet activation in heat-inactivated compared to non-heat-inactivated sera. This phenomenon was seen in low and high heparin steps, although it did not occur for all samples. There were discrepant results in seven samples, which tested negative in the non-heat-inactivated protocol and positive in the heat-inactivated protocol. There was no case in which the result of a non-heat-inactivated aliquot was positive and the corresponding heat-inactivated aliquot was negative. DISCUSSION: Due to the higher percentages of donor platelet activation, all seven non-compliant cases met our current criteria for a positive result. However, those results were probably false-positive based on ELISA optical density value and 4T score. Therefore, in the current settings, heat inactivation of serum is not suitable for our flow cytometric functional assay since it can cause an elevated risk of creating false-positive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.