ArticleBlood2022
Progression and survival of MBL: a screening study of 10 139 individuals.
Article in Blood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-normal immunoglobulin suggests monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and constitutional CLL susceptibility: a dual-mechanism analysis.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Single-cell epigenetic and transcriptomic states across the continuum of monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis to chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Genome biology · 2026Article
- CHIP amplifies the risk of lymphoid malignancies in individuals with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL).Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Progressive T cell defects correlate with disease outcome in high-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis.Leukemia · 2025Article
- State of the art biology, progression, and clinical management of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL): consensus report from the Intercepting Blood Cancers Workshop Committee.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis: The Silent Clone the Haematologists Should Not Neglect.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Early Immune Cell and Antibody Kinetics Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Healthy Adults and Low-Count Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Next-generation sequencing and high DNA input identify previously missed measurable residual disease in peripheral blood of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Risk of Incident Melanoma Among Individuals With Low-Count Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- Mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs) in individuals with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL).Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Defining precancer: a grand challenge for the cancer community.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- Article
- Prehistory of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: clues from the B-cell receptor.Haematologica · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Role of the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Lymphoma: Implications in Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- High frequency of low-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.Blood · 2023Article
- Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment algorithm 2022.Blood cancer journal · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a common hematological premalignant condition that is understudied in screening cohorts. MBL can be classified into low-count (LC) and high-count (HC) types based on the size of the B-cell clone. Using the Mayo Clinic Biobank, we screened for MBL and evaluated its association with future hematologic malignancy and overall survival (OS). We had a two-stage study design including discovery and validation cohorts. We screened for MBL using an eight-color flow-cytometry assay. Medical records were abstracted for hematological cancers and death. We used Cox regression to evaluate associations and estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age and sex. We identified 1712 (17%) individuals with MBL (95% LC-MBL), and the median follow-up time for OS was 34.4 months with 621 individuals who died. We did not observe an association with OS among individuals with LC-MBL (P = .78) but did among HC-MBL (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1; P = .03). Among the discovery cohort with a median of 10.0 years follow-up, 31 individuals developed hematological cancers with two-thirds being lymphoid malignancies. MBL was associated with 3.6-fold risk of hematological cancer compared to controls (95% CI, 1.7-7.7; P < .001) and 7.7-fold increased risk for lymphoid malignancies (95% CI:3.1-19.2; P < .001). LC-MBL was associated with 4.3-fold risk of lymphoid malignancies (95% CI, 1.4-12.7; P = .009); HC-MBL had a 74-fold increased risk (95% CI, 22-246; P < .001). In this large screening cohort, we observed similar survival among individuals with and without LC-MBL, yet individuals with LC-MBL have a fourfold increased risk of lymphoid malignancies. Accumulating evidence indicates that there are clinical consequences to LC-MBL, a condition that affects 8 to 10 million adults in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.