ReviewNeurology2022
Who to Enroll in Parkinson Disease Prevention Trials? The Case for Genetically At-Risk Cohorts.
Review in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective Effects of Genetic Proxies of Cognitive Reserve in Parkinson's Disease: A Longitudinal Multi-Cohort Study.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Stable two-year longitudinal clinical outcomes in LRRK2 G2019S non-manifest carriers in a remote nationwide study.Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Perspectives of People At-Risk on Parkinson's Prevention Research.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- Pharmacotherapy for Disease Modification in Early Parkinson's Disease: How Early Should We Be?Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- Who is at Risk of Parkinson Disease? Refining the Preclinical Phase of GBA1 and LRRK2 Variant Carriers: a Clinical, Biochemical, and Imaging Approach.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- Machine learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of Parkinson's disease using brain imaging: general overview, main challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Review
- What to Test in Parkinson Disease Prevention Trials? Repurposed, Low-Risk, and Gene-Targeted Drugs.Neurology · 2022Review
- Planning for Prevention of Parkinson Disease: Now Is the Time.Neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapies that prevent the occurrence of Parkinson disease (PD) (primary prevention) or mitigate the progression of symptoms in those with early disease (secondary prevention) are a critical unmet need in disease management. Despite great promise, PD prevention trials have not yet demonstrated success. Initiation of treatment too late in the disease course and the heterogeneity of disease are obstacles that may have contributed to the failure. Genetically stratified groups offer many advantages to primary and secondary prevention trials. In addition to their ease of identification, they decrease disease heterogeneity on several levels. Particularly, they comprise a phenotypically and pathologically enriched group with defined clinical features, pathogenic mechanisms and associated proteins that may serve as specific trial endpoints, therapeutic targets and biomarkers for disease state, and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic status. However, challenges arise from genetic variant heterogeneity, from reduced penetrance whereby many carriers will not develop PD, and in recruiting a population that will meet the desired outcome in the proposed study duration. In this review, we discussed the opportunities afforded by the enrollment of genetically stratified cohorts (i.e., leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 and glucocerebrosidase 1) into prevention trials with a primary focus on primary prevention trials. We also outlined challenges surrounding the enrollment of these cohorts and offered suggestions to leverage their many advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.