ArticleScientific reports2022
The role of traditional obesity parameters in predicting the number of stenosed coronary arteries (≥ 60%) among patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic syndrome in reproductive age: A cross-sectional study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2025Article
- The variations in health cost based on the traditional obesity parameters among patients with coronary artery diseases undergoing cardiac catheterization.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Arterial stiffness in subclinical atherosclerosis quantified with ultrafast pulse wave velocity measurements: a comparison with a healthy population using propensity score matching.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Article
- Obesity phenotypes and cardiovascular risk: From pathophysiology to clinical management.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023Review
- The Role of Traditional Obesity Parameters in Predicting Frailty among Coronary Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The correlation between obesity and coronary artery disease (CAD) has been well-documented in the literature. Body mass index, waist-height ratio, waist-hip ratio, body adiposity index, body shape index, waist circumference, and hip circumference are traditional obesity parameters used to measure obesity. This study aimed to investigate the role of these traditional obesity parameters in the prediction of the number of stenosed coronary arteries (≥ 60%) among patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 220 hospitalized patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in two hospitals in Jordan. Bivariate Pearson's correlation and forward linear regression analysis were used in the current study. Hip circumference was identified as being the best predictor of CAD (r = 0.5), with the best cut-off value of 103 cm (sensitivity = 0.92, specificity = 0.58). Hip circumference had significant regression levels with the number of stented coronary arteries (P = 0.002) and the number of severe stenosed coronary arteries (P = 0.04). The second-best obesity parameter in predicting CAD was waist circumference (r = 0.4), with a cut-off value of 0.95 m (sensitivity = 0.76, specificity = 0.68). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), triglycerides, and smoking had significant positive correlations with the number of stented coronary arteries (P < 0.05). Hip circumference of ≥ 103 cm, increased serum level of triglycerides, HS-CRP, and being a smoker are all factors which can predict CAD or the risk of developing it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.