ArticleScientific reports2022
FVC, but not FEV
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impulse oscillometry with quantitative computed tomography provides additional clinical information beyond spirometry in chronic airflow obstruction: a pilot study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Risk Factors of FEV₁/FVC Decline in COPD Patients.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Observational
- Daytime and Nighttime Visual Analog Scales May Be Useful in Assessing Asthma Control Levels Before and After Treatment.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of forced vital capacity (FVC) on clinical outcomes of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases overlap (ACO) are still unknown. We conducted this study to examine the association of FVC on clinical outcomes in ACO. Data from the Korean COPD Subgroup Study cohort were analyzed. Patients who fulfilled the ACO criteria were included and grouped according to FVC changes, such as FVC-incline and FVC-decline. No significant differences were observed between the FVC-incline and FVC-decline groups in baseline clinical characteristics. In a year after, FVC-decline group experienced more moderate (47.1% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.02) and moderate-to-severe (49.8% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.03) acute exacerbations (AEs), compared to FVC-incline group. The frequency of moderate AEs (1.3 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.03) and moderate-to-severe AEs (1.5 ± 2.5 vs. 1.1 ± 1.9, p = 0.04) were higher in the FVC-decline group than in the FVC-incline groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, FVC-decline group was associated with moderate AEs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.44; p = 0.04), and moderate-to-severe AEs (OR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.01-2.41; p < 0.05) in ACO patients, which was not seen in FEV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.