Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022
Progesterone supplementation in natural cycles improves live birth rates after embryo transfer of frozen-thawed embryos-a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06875752 (Is There a Need for Luteal Support in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Is There a Need for Luteal Support in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cycle regimens for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of vaginal vs oral progesterone supplementation before embryo transfer on live birth rates and levels: a randomized trial.Reproduction & fertility · 2025Trial
- Initiating luteal phase support with sc progesterone based on low serum progesterone on the transfer day in true natural cycle frozen embryo transfers.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Trial
- Optimizing the protocol for modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (mNC-FET): a multicentre, single-blinded randomized controlled trial.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Comparison of oral dydrogesterone and vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in natural and modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfers.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Defining the LH surge in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: the role of LH, estradiol, and progesterone.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Observational
- Exogenous progesterone rescue in patients with low mid-luteal serum progesterone levels undergoing true natural vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Current Ovulation and Luteal Phase Tracking Methods and Technologies for Fertility and Family Planning: A Review.Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2024Review
- Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2024Review
- The true natural cycle frozen embryo transfer - impact of patient and follicular phase characteristics on serum progesterone levels one day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
- Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDoes supplementation with vaginal tablets of progesterone after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in natural cycles improve the live birth rate? SUMMARY ANSWER: Supplementation with vaginal tablets of progesterone after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in natural cycles significantly improves the number of live births. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Progesterone supplementation during luteal phase and early pregnancy may improve the number of live births after frozen-thawed embryo transfer. However, due to the limited number of previous studies, being mainly retrospective, evidence is still limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial, performed at two university clinics. In total, 500 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups, during the period February 2013 to March 2018. Randomization was performed after a frozen embryo transfer in a natural cycle by use of opaque sealed envelopes. The primary outcome was live birth rate; secondary outcomes were pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rate, and if there was a possible association between the serum progesterone concentration on the day of embryo transfer and live birth rate. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsWomen, receiving embryo transfer in natural cycles participated in the study. The embryos were frozen on Day 2, 3, 5 or 6. In total, 672 women having regular menstrual cycles were invited to participate in the study; of those, 500 agreed to participate and 488 were finally included in the study. Half of the study subjects received progesterone supplementation with progesterone vaginal tablets, 100 mg twice daily, starting from the day of embryo transfer. The other half of the subjects were not given any treatment. Blood samples for serum progesterone measurements were collected from all subjects on the day of embryo transfer. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were no differences in background characteristics between the study groups. In the progesterone supplemented group, 83 of 243 patients (34.2%) had a live birth, compared to 59 of 245 patients (24.1%) in the control group (odds ratio 1.635, 95% CI 1.102-2.428, P = 0.017*). The number of pregnancies was 104 of 243 (42.8%) and 83 of 245 (33.9%), respectively (odds ratio 1.465, 95% CI 1.012-2.108, P = 0.049*) and the number of clinical pregnancies was 91 of 243 (37.4%) and 70 of 245 (28.6%), respectively (odds ratio 1.497, 95% CI 1.024-2.188, P = 0.043*). There were no significant differences in biochemical pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate. There was no correlation between outcome and serum progesterone concentration. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was not blinded because placebo tablets were not available. Supplementation started on embryo transfer day, regardless of the age of the embryos, which resulted in a shorter supplementation time for Day 5/6 embryos compared to Day 2/3 embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsSupplementation with progesterone in natural cycles improved the number of live births after frozen-thawed embryo transfer and should therefore be considered for introduction in clinical routine. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by Uppsala University, the Uppsala-Family Planning Foundation, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals AB, Malmö, Sweden. The authors have no personal conflicting interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL4152. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 5 December 2013. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 18 February 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.