Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35972453›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2022

Progesterone supplementation in natural cycles improves live birth rates after embryo transfer of frozen-thawed embryos-a randomized controlled trial.

K Wånggren, M Dahlgren Granbom, S I Iliadis, J Gudmundsson, A Stavreus-Evers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06875752 (Is There a Need for Luteal Support in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06875752 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Is There a Need for Luteal Support in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsLuteal Support, Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)Armsno luteal support, Vaginal Progesterone, Progesterone plus HCG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cycle regimens for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K WånggrenDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-4531
M Dahlgren GranbomDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
S I IliadisDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J GudmundssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
A Stavreus-EversDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes supplementation with vaginal tablets of progesterone after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in natural cycles improve the live birth rate? SUMMARY ANSWER: Supplementation with vaginal tablets of progesterone after frozen-thawed embryo transfer in natural cycles significantly improves the number of live births. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Progesterone supplementation during luteal phase and early pregnancy may improve the number of live births after frozen-thawed embryo transfer. However, due to the limited number of previous studies, being mainly retrospective, evidence is still limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial, performed at two university clinics. In total, 500 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups, during the period February 2013 to March 2018. Randomization was performed after a frozen embryo transfer in a natural cycle by use of opaque sealed envelopes. The primary outcome was live birth rate; secondary outcomes were pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rate, and if there was a possible association between the serum progesterone concentration on the day of embryo transfer and live birth rate. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsWomen, receiving embryo transfer in natural cycles participated in the study. The embryos were frozen on Day 2, 3, 5 or 6. In total, 672 women having regular menstrual cycles were invited to participate in the study; of those, 500 agreed to participate and 488 were finally included in the study. Half of the study subjects received progesterone supplementation with progesterone vaginal tablets, 100 mg twice daily, starting from the day of embryo transfer. The other half of the subjects were not given any treatment. Blood samples for serum progesterone measurements were collected from all subjects on the day of embryo transfer. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were no differences in background characteristics between the study groups. In the progesterone supplemented group, 83 of 243 patients (34.2%) had a live birth, compared to 59 of 245 patients (24.1%) in the control group (odds ratio 1.635, 95% CI 1.102-2.428, P = 0.017*). The number of pregnancies was 104 of 243 (42.8%) and 83 of 245 (33.9%), respectively (odds ratio 1.465, 95% CI 1.012-2.108, P = 0.049*) and the number of clinical pregnancies was 91 of 243 (37.4%) and 70 of 245 (28.6%), respectively (odds ratio 1.497, 95% CI 1.024-2.188, P = 0.043*). There were no significant differences in biochemical pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate. There was no correlation between outcome and serum progesterone concentration. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was not blinded because placebo tablets were not available. Supplementation started on embryo transfer day, regardless of the age of the embryos, which resulted in a shorter supplementation time for Day 5/6 embryos compared to Day 2/3 embryos. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsSupplementation with progesterone in natural cycles improved the number of live births after frozen-thawed embryo transfer and should therefore be considered for introduction in clinical routine. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was funded by Uppsala University, the Uppsala-Family Planning Foundation, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals AB, Malmö, Sweden. The authors have no personal conflicting interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL4152. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 5 December 2013. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 18 February 2013.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousBirth RateDietary SupplementsEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateProgesteroneProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesProgesteroneVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jelliesblastocystclinical pregnancyfrozen embryo transferlive birthmiscarriagenatural cyclesprogesteroneRCTSETsupplementation

Identifiers

PMID35972453
PMCPMC9527461
OpenAlexW4292064775

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.