Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974369›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Prevention of muscle atrophy in ICU patients without nerve injury by neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a randomized controlled study.

Weiwei Bao, Jiajia Yang, Mingna Li, Kang Chen, Zheng Ma, Yuehong Bai, Yiming Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weiwei BaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Jiajia YangThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingna LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Kang ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Zheng MaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yuehong BaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yiming XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. Yui5@163.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 2015ZB0403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtensive muscle atrophy is a common occurrence in orthopaedics patients who are bedridden or immobilized. The incidence is higher in intensive care unit (ICU) inpatients. There is still controversy about how to use neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in ICU patients. We aim to compare the effectiveness and safety of NMES to prevent muscle atrophy in intensive care unit (ICU) patients without nerve injury.

methodsICU patients without central and peripheral nerve injury were randomized into experimental group I (Exp I: active and passive activity training (APAT) + NMES treatment on the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscle), experimental group II (Exp II: APAT + NMES treatment on gastrocnemius alone), and control group (Ctl: APAT alone). Changes in the strength of gastrocnemius, the ankle range of motion, and the muscle cross-section area of the lower leg were evaluated before and after the intervention. Also, changes in prothrombin time, lactic acid, and C-reactive protein were monitored during the treatment.

resultsThe gastrocnemius muscle strength, ankle joint range of motion, and cross-sectional muscle area of the lower leg in the three groups showed a downward trend, indicating that the overall trend of muscle atrophy in ICU patients was irreversible. The decrease in gastrocnemius muscle strength in Exp I and Exp II was smaller than that in the control group (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between Exp I and Exp II. The decrease in active ankle range of motion and cross-sectional area of the lower leg Exp I and Exp II was smaller than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the decrease in Exp I was smaller than that of Exp II (all P < 0.05). The curative effect in Exp I was better than in Exp II. There were no significant differences in the dynamic changes of prothrombin time, lactic acid, and C-reactive protein during the three groups (P > 0.05).

conclusionIn addition to early exercise training, NMES should be applied to prevent muscle atrophy for patients without nerve injury in ICU. Also, simultaneous NMES treatment on agonist/antagonist muscle can enhance the effect of preventing muscle atrophy.

trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered in China Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ) on 16/05/2020 as ChiCTR2000032950.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyIntensive Care UnitsMuscular AtrophyC-Reactive ProteinHumansLactic AcidMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthC-Reactive ProteinLactic AcidEfficacyICUMuscular atrophyNMESPreventionSafetyStrategy

Identifiers

PMID35974369
PMCPMC9380284
OpenAlexW4291926386

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.