Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35974932›Full record

ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2022

Intake of food groups and cervical cancer in women at risk for cervical cancer: A nested case-control study.

Mogge Hajiesmaeil, Samaneh Mirzaei Dahka, Ruin Khorrami, Samira Rastgoo, Fatemeh Bourbour, Sayed Hossein Davoodi, Fatemeh Shafiee, Maryam Gholamalizadeh, Saheb Abbas Torki, Mohammad Esmail Akbari and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Disparities in Cervical Cancer Among LHS+ Women: A Primer for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mogge HajiesmaeilDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Samaneh Mirzaei DahkaStudent Research Committee, Guilan university of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Ruin KhorramiGarmsar Islamic Azad university. Garmsar, Iran.
Samira RastgooDepartments of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh BourbourDepartments of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sayed Hossein DavoodiFaculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, Departments of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh ShafieeNutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam GholamalizadehStudent Research Committee, Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saheb Abbas TorkiDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Esmail AkbariCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeid DoaeiReproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Zahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRGuilan University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRNational Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute · IRSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The risk of cervical cancer was reported to be influenced by dietary components. This study aimed to illustrate the association between cervical cancer with the intake of food groups in women with a history of cervical neoplasia. Methods: This nested case-control study was conducted in 558 people with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), including 279 women with cervical cancers and 279 controls with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). A validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess the intake of food groups. Results: The intake of fruits and vegetables in the case group was significantly lower than the control group (P=0.001). Low intake of dairy products, vegetables, and fruits was associated with cervical cancer risk (OR=4.67; 95% CI 1.2-9.49, P=0.001; OR=9.75, 95% CI 1.36-19. 51, P=0.001; and OR=4.82, 95% CI 1.09-7.25, P=0.001, respectively). After adjusting for age, family history, age at first menstruation, number of children, history of vaginal infection, and age at first sexual intercourse, the results were still significant. Additional adjustments to BMI did not change the results. Conclusion: The results indicate that the risk of cervical cancer can be affected by the intake of certain food groups. Further longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the underlying mechanism of the influence of dietary components on cervical cancer risk.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaDietary intakeFood group.

Identifiers

PMID35974932
PMCPMC9348217
OpenAlexW4301102377

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.