Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35979635›Full record

ArticleCancer research2022

Efficacy of CD40 Agonists Is Mediated by Distinct cDC Subsets and Subverted by Suppressive Macrophages.

Aleksandar Murgaski, Máté Kiss, Helena Van Damme, Daliya Kancheva, Isaure Vanmeerbeek, Jiri Keirsse, Eva Hadadi, Jan Brughmans, Sana M Arnouk, Ahmed E I Hamouda and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of cDC2 in priming CD8Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The diversity of CD8Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Targeting conserved TIM3Science advances · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Aleksandar MurgaskiMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5606-2230
Máté KissMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5649-0382
Helena Van DammeMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-2907
Daliya KanchevaMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6222-0461
Isaure VanmeerbeekLaboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI), Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-6008
Jiri KeirsseMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-5858
Eva HadadiMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5253-814X
Jan BrughmansMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0839-0990
Sana M ArnoukMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2045-6729
Ahmed E I HamoudaMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-9585
Ayla DebraekeleerMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3109-9862
Victor BosteelsLaboratory for ER stress and Inflammation, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8838-021X
Yvon ElkrimMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-456X
Louis BoonJJP Biologics, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0937-9171
Sabine HovesRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Discovery Oncology, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4953-7234
Niels VandammeData Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6582-0040
Sofie DeschoemaekerMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-282X
Sophie JanssensLaboratory for ER stress and Inflammation, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-1636
Abhishek D GargLaboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI), Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9976-9922
Greetje Vande VeldeDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5633-3993
Martina SchmittnaegelRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Discovery Oncology, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6759-6433
Carola H RiesRoche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Discovery Oncology, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1855-8745
Damya LaouiMyeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3373-1403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agonistic αCD40 therapy has been shown to inhibit cancer progression in only a fraction of patients. Understanding the cancer cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental determinants of αCD40 therapy response is therefore crucial to identify responsive patient populations and to design efficient combinatorial treatments. Here, we show that the therapeutic efficacy of αCD40 in subcutaneous melanoma relies on preexisting, type 1 classical dendritic cell (cDC1)-primed CD8+ T cells. However, after administration of αCD40, cDC1s were dispensable for antitumor efficacy. Instead, the abundance of activated cDCs, potentially derived from cDC2 cells, increased and further activated antitumor CD8+ T cells. Hence, distinct cDC subsets contributed to the induction of αCD40 responses. In contrast, lung carcinomas, characterized by a high abundance of macrophages, were resistant to αCD40 therapy. Combining αCD40 therapy with macrophage depletion led to tumor growth inhibition only in the presence of strong neoantigens. Accordingly, treatment with immunogenic cell death-inducing chemotherapy sensitized lung tumors to αCD40 therapy in subcutaneous and orthotopic settings. These insights into the microenvironmental regulators of response to αCD40 suggest that different tumor types would benefit from different combinations of therapies to optimize the clinical application of CD40 agonists. SIGNIFICANCE: This work highlights the temporal roles of different dendritic cell subsets in promoting CD8+ T-cell-driven responses to CD40 agonist therapy in cancer.

Indexed as

CD40 AntigensDendritic CellsMacrophagesNeoplasmsAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCD40 Antigens

Identifiers

PMID35979635
PMCPMC9574379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.