Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35980580›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Studying Protein Function Using Nanobodies and Other Protein Binders in Drosophila.

Katarzyna Lepeta, Milena Bauer, Gustavo Aguilar, M Alessandra Vigano, Shinya Matsuda, Markus Affolter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katarzyna Lepeta *Biozentrum der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Milena Bauer *Biozentrum der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Gustavo Aguilar *Biozentrum der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
M Alessandra ViganoBiozentrum der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Shinya MatsudaBiozentrum der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Markus AffolterBiozentrum der Universität Basel, Basel, Switzerland. markus.affolter@unibas.ch.
University of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct manipulation of proteins by nanobodies and other protein binders has become an additional and valuable approach to investigate development and homeostasis in Drosophila. In contrast to other techniques, that indirectly interfere with proteins via their nucleic acids (CRISPR, RNAi, etc.), protein binders permit direct and acute protein manipulation. Since the first use of a nanobody in Drosophila a decade ago, many different applications exploiting protein binders have been introduced. Most of these applications use nanobodies against GFP to regulate GFP fusion proteins. In order to exert specific protein manipulations, protein binders are linked to domains that confer them precise biochemical functions. Here, we reflect on the use of tools based on protein binders in Drosophila. We describe their key features and provide an overview of the available reagents. Finally, we briefly explore the future avenues that protein binders might open up and thus further contribute to better understand development and homeostasis of multicellular organisms.

Indexed as

Single-Domain AntibodiesAnimalsDrosophilaProteinsProteinsSingle-Domain AntibodiesDARPinsDevelopmentDrosophilaGFPNanobodiesProtein Binders

Identifiers

PMID35980580
OpenAlexW4292230802

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.