ArticleSports health
Norm Values of Muscular Strength Across the Life Span in a Healthy Swiss Population: The COmPLETE Study.
Article in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Daily Rhythm-Aligned Training on Skeletal Muscle Adaptation in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Relative and absolute intensity accelerometer metrics decipher the effects of age, sex, and occupation on physical activity.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Agility training to integratively promote neuromuscular, cardiorespiratory and cognitive function in healthy older adults: a one-year randomized-controlled trial.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrip strength is used to estimate whole-body strength for health surveillance purposes. Explosive strength is considered important, yet economic measures able to detect early deterioration of neuromuscular capabilities are lacking. Whether handgrip maximum rate of force development (GRFD) or whole-body strength tests are better predictors of lower body power than handgrip maximum strength (GF HYPOTHESIS: GRFD should be more closely related to lower body power than GF STUDY
designCross-sectional. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b.
methodsA total of 613 healthy participants aged 20 to 91 years were tested for countermovement jump peak power, GF
resultsPeak power (P
conclusionGRFD was not superior to maximum strength in predicting lower body power. For health surveillance purposes, it therefore appears that GF CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Incorporating countermovement jump testing for early detection of declines in explosive capabilities might be advised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.