Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35987928›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2022

Reclassifying tumour cell cycle activity in terms of its tissue of origin.

Arian Lundberg, Joan Jong Jing Yi, Linda S Lindström, Nicholas P Tobin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Arian LundbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6630-2787
Joan Jong Jing YiSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 637551, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-301X
Linda S LindströmDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nicholas P TobinDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. nick.tobin@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-9772
Karolinska University Hospital · SENanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 190140Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 200802Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare) 2019-00477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic alterations resulting in loss of control over the cell cycle is a fundamental hallmark of human malignancies. Whilst pan-cancer studies have broadly assessed tumour genomics and their impact on oncogenic pathways, analyses taking the baseline signalling levels in normal tissue into account are lacking. To this end, we aimed to reclassify the cell cycle activity of tumours in terms of their tissue of origin and determine if any common DNA mutations, chromosome arm-level changes or signalling pathways contribute to an increase in baseline corrected cell cycle activity. Combining normal tissue and pan-cancer data from over 13,000 samples we demonstrate that tumours of gynaecological origin show the highest levels of corrected cell cycle activity, partially owing to hormonal signalling and gene expression changes. We also show that normal and tumour tissues can be separated into groups (quadrants) of low/high cell cycle activity and propose the hypothesis of an upper limit on these activity levels in tumours.

Identifiers

PMID35987928
PMCPMC9392789
OpenAlexW4292415849

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.