ArticleFood science and biotechnology2022
Peptidomics analysis of enzymatic hydrolysis beef.
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Alcalase and Pepsin Hydrolysis on Gel Forming Behavior and Technological Properties of Porcine Skin Gelatin.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Flavorzyme HydrolyzedFood science of animal resources · 2025Article
- Enzymatic valorization of fishery by-products: harnessing cold-adapted marine proteases for sustainable production of bioactive peptides.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the changes in the composition of peptides during the digestion of tenderized beef treated with commercial proteinase K, flavourzyme, and bromelain. The degree of hydrolysis (DH) values before and after simulating gastric digestion were highest with proteinase K treatment. In the proteinase K-treated sample, the highest number of missing peptides was identified after gastrointestinal digestion. Additionally, the maximum number of new peptides was identified during gastric digestion. The flavourzyme is the only exopeptidase among the three enzymes, and the sample treated with it could produce more unique peptides after gastrointestinal digestion. Enzymatic tenderization altered the peptide composition and bioactivity of beef proteins during gastrointestinal digestion. The number of peptides, as well as unique peptides in the protease-treated sample, were more than those in control through gastric digestion. In contrast, the opposite was observed post gastrointestinal digestion. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10068-022-01122-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.