ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2022
OARD: Open annotations for rare diseases and their phenotypes based on real-world data.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- PhenoSS: phenotype semantic similarity-based approach for rare disease prediction and patient clustering.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- PhenoSS: Phenotype semantic similarity-based approach for rare disease prediction and patient clustering.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- TimeX: Phenotype Onset Extraction from Clinical Narratives.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Information content as a health system screening tool for rare diseases.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Identifying Phenotypes for Earlier Diagnosis of Rare Diseases.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2025Article
- Implications of mappings between International Classification of Diseases clinical diagnosis codes and Human Phenotype Ontology terms.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- Phenotype driven molecular genetic test recommendation for diagnosing pediatric rare disorders.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Generating Biomedical Knowledge Graphs from Knowledge Bases, Registries, and Multiomic Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Objectivizing issues in the diagnosis of complex rare diseases: lessons learned from testing existing diagnosis support systems on ciliopathies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Phenotype-Driven Molecular Genetic Test Recommendation for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Disorders.Research square · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosis for rare genetic diseases often relies on phenotype-driven methods, which hinge on the accuracy and completeness of the rare disease phenotypes in the underlying annotation knowledgebase. Existing knowledgebases are often manually curated with additional annotations found in published case reports. Despite their potential, real-world data such as electronic health records (EHRs) have not been fully exploited to derive rare disease annotations. Here, we present open annotation for rare diseases (OARD), a real-world-data-derived resource with annotation for rare-disease-related phenotypes. This resource is derived from the EHRs of two academic health institutions containing more than 10 million individuals spanning wide age ranges and different disease subgroups. By leveraging ontology mapping and advanced natural-language-processing (NLP) methods, OARD automatically and efficiently extracts concepts for both rare diseases and their phenotypic traits from billing codes and lab tests as well as over 100 million clinical narratives. The rare disease prevalence derived by OARD is highly correlated with those annotated in the original rare disease knowledgebase. By performing association analysis, we identified more than 1 million novel disease-phenotype association pairs that were previously missed by human annotation, and >60% were confirmed true associations via manual review of a list of sampled pairs. Compared to the manual curated annotation, OARD is 100% data driven and its pipeline can be shared across different institutions. By supporting privacy-preserving sharing of aggregated summary statistics, such as term frequencies and disease-phenotype associations, it fills an important gap to facilitate data-driven research in the rare disease community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.