Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999639›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2022

Barriers and facilitators to using aspirin for preventive therapy: a qualitative study exploring the views and experiences of people with Lynch syndrome and healthcare providers.

Kelly E Lloyd, Robbie Foy, Louise H Hall, Lucy Ziegler, Sophie M C Green, Zainab F Haider, David G Taylor, Mairead MacKenzie, Samuel G Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary care: the 'linchpin' in Lynch syndrome.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly E LloydLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK. umkel@leeds.ac.uk.
Robbie FoyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Louise H HallLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Lucy ZieglerLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Sophie M C GreenLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
Zainab F HaiderLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
David G TaylorSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Mairead MacKenzieIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.
Samuel G SmithLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
University of Leeds · GBThe Patients Association · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 24991Cancer Research UK A24991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NG151) recommends considering daily aspirin for people with Lynch syndrome to reduce colorectal cancer risk. However, deciding whether to initiate aspirin could be a complex decision for patients and their healthcare providers, as both the potential benefits and harms need to be considered.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews to explore the barriers and facilitators to using aspirin for preventive therapy. We recruited 15 people with Lynch syndrome, and 23 healthcare providers across multiple professions in primary, and specialist care (e.g. clinical genetics) in the United Kingdom. Interview schedules were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

resultsThere were three themes: 1) Considering potential harms and benefits; 2) Healthcare pathway; 3) Patients' level of interest in aspirin. All healthcare providers, across primary and specialist care, viewed general practitioners (GPs) as being responsible for prescribing and overseeing the use of aspirin. However, GPs were unfamiliar with aspirin for preventive therapy, and concerned about prescribing at higher doses (300-600 mg). To support decision-making, GPs wanted clarification from specialist clinicians on the evidence and dose to prescribe. Not all participants with Lynch syndrome received information on aspirin from their healthcare provider, and several were unsure who to discuss aspirin with. GPs were more inclined to prescribe aspirin for patients with expressed preferences for the medication, however several patients were uncertain and wanted further guidance.

conclusionsCoordinated and multilevel strategies are needed, addressing the needs of both GPs and people with Lynch syndrome, to ensure consistent implementation of national guidance on aspirin for preventive therapy.

Indexed as

AspirinChemopreventionDecision-makingLynch syndromeNSAIDPreventive therapy

Identifiers

PMID35999639
PMCPMC9396868
OpenAlexW4292823086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.