Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35999942›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2022

Efficacy of Repeating Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People with COPD: A Systematic Review.

Angela T Burge, Carla Malaguti, Mariana Hoffman, Alan Shiell, Christine F McDonald, David J Berlowitz, Anne E Holland

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela T BurgeRespiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5455-6467
Carla MalagutiRespiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6619-136X
Mariana HoffmanRespiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-2958
Alan ShiellDepartment of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5914-1084
Christine F McDonaldInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-3391
David J BerlowitzInstitute for Breathing and Sleep, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2543-8722
Anne E HollandRespiratory Research@Alfred, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-845X
Institute for Breathing and Sleep · AUThe University of Melbourne · AULa Trobe University · AURespiratory Clinical Trials · AUUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People with COPD undertake repeat programs, but synthesis of evidence regarding such practice has not been undertaken. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the effects of repeating pulmonary rehabilitation subsequent to an initial program in people with COPD. Methods: Studies where participants with COPD undertook >1 pulmonary rehabilitation program were included, incorporating RCT (randomized controlled trial) and non-randomized studies. Electronic database searches were undertaken. Two authors independently undertook study identification, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL); secondary outcomes were exercise capacity, hospitalizations and exacerbations, adherence, mortality and adverse events. Narrative synthesis was undertaken for clinically heterogeneous trials. Data from RCTs and non-randomized studies were not combined for analysis. Results: Ten included studies (2 RCTs) involved 907 participants with COPD (n=653 had undertaken >1 program). The majority of studies were at high risk of bias. One RCT (n=33) reported no difference in HRQol after a repeat program vs usual care following exacerbation (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire dyspnea domain score MD 0.4, 95% CI -0.5 to 3). In stable patients, clinically important and statistically significant improvements in HRQoL and exercise capacity were reported after repeat programs, but of a smaller magnitude than initial programs. There was evidence for reductions in exacerbations and hospitalizations, and shorter hospital length of stay for patients who repeated a program twice in 12 months compared to those who repeated once. No data for mortality or adverse events were available. Conclusion: This systematic review provides limited evidence for benefits of repeating pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD, including improved HRQoL and exercise capacity, and reduced hospitalizations. However, most studies have high risk of bias, which reduces the certainty of these conclusions. Study Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020215093).

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveClinical Trials as TopicDyspneaHospitalizationHumansQuality of LifeCOPDrepeat pulmonary rehabilitationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35999942
PMCPMC9393021
OpenAlexW4292313931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.