Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005181›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Engaging Patients in the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Initiative: Processes and Lessons Learned.

William K Evans, Pam Takhar, Valerie McDonald, Martine Elias, Louise Binder, Stéphanie Michaud, Mina Tadrous, Caroline Muñoz, Kelvin K W Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

William K EvansDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2069-1593
Pam TakharOntario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.
Valerie McDonaldIndependent Patient Representative, Toronto, ON M6G 2V3, Canada.
Martine EliasMyeloma Canada, Dorval, QC H9P 2V4, Canada.
Louise BinderSave Your Skin Foundation, Penticton, BC V2A 0B2, Canada.
Stéphanie MichaudBioCanRx, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Mina TadrousLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada.
Caroline MuñozOntario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.
Kelvin K W ChanTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Public Health Ontario · CAMcMaster University · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR HRC-154126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration established the Engagement Working Group (WG) to ensure that all key stakeholders had an opportunity to provide input into the development and implementation of the CanREValue Real-World Evidence (RWE) Framework. Two consultations were held in 2021 to solicit patient perspectives on key policy and data access issues identified in the interim policy and data WG reports. Over 30 individuals, representing patients, caregivers, advocacy leaders, and individuals engaged in patient research were invited to participate. The consultations provided important feedback and valuable lessons in patient engagement. Patient leaders actively shaped the process and content of the consultation. Breakout groups facilitated by patient advocacy leaders gave the opportunity for open and thoughtful contributions from all participants. Important recommendations were made: the RWE framework should not impede access to new drugs; it should be used to support conditional approvals; patient relevant endpoints should be captured in provincial datasets; access to data to conduct RWE should be improved; and privacy issues must be considered. The manuscript documents the CanREValue experience of engaging patients in a consultative process and the useful contributions that can be achieved when the processes to engage are guided by patients themselves.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCanadaHumansPatient ParticipationAntineoplastic Agentshealth technology assessmentpatient engagementreal-world evidencereassessment

Identifiers

PMID36005181
PMCPMC9406430
OpenAlexW4290466771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.