ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Global Perspective.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences and gender-related factors in the management and perception of LDL-cholesterol in ASCVD: Real-Life evidence from the EPHESUS registry in cardiology practice.Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Article
- Association of Door-to-Balloon Delay with Complications and Length of Hospital Stays in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating Sex-Based Disparities in STEMI Care: A Call for Methodological Rigor.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Sex Disparities in Ischemic Heart Disease in South Asia: The Role of Dietary Factors.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in an underrepresented region: insights from the Serbian (RS) SCAD registry.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Circulating Mitochondrial Open Reading Frame of the 12S Ribosomal RNA Type-c Is Higher in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Is a Prognostic Biomarker for Major Cardiac Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case-Control Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective real-world study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Changing clinical perspectives on sex and healthcare disparities in ischaemic heart disease.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- Gender-based differences among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in Egypt: secondary analysis from the ACCA-EAPCI ESC-STEMI registry.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of access to stroke diagnostics, treatment, rehabilitation, and outcome between men and women.Global epidemiology · 2025Article
- Experiences Receiving and Delivering Virtual Health Care For Women: Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Gender-stratified analyses of symptoms associated with life-threatening events in patients calling out-of-hours primary care for shortness of breath.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- To study the role of triglyceride glucose index (TyG Index) as a novel biomarker in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Traditional and Non-Traditional Risk Factors of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Women: Evidence from the ANCORS-YW Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Scoping Review Across the Care Continuum.Global heart · 2025Article
- Article
- Gender differences in presentation, management, and outcomes among Egyptian patients with acute coronary syndrome: a single-centre registry.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Observational
- Article
- The sex gap in bladder cancer survival - a missing link in bladder cancer care?Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite increasing evidence and improvements in the care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), sex disparities in presentation, comorbidities, access to care and invasive therapies remain, even in the most developed countries. Much of the currently available data are derived from more developed regions of the world, particularly Europe and the Americas. In contrast, in more resource-constrained settings, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa and some parts of Asia, more data are needed to identify the prevalence of sex disparities in ACS, as well as factors responsible for these disparities, particularly cultural, socioeconomic, educational and psychosocial. This review summarizes the available evidence of sex differences in ACS, including risk factors, pathophysiology and biases in care from a global perspective, with a focus on each of the six different World Health Organization (WHO) regions of the world. Regional trends and disparities, gaps in evidence and solutions to mitigate these disparities are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.