ArticleMedical physics2023
Automated segmentation of five different body tissues on computed tomography using deep learning.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- FocusedON-BC: A Robust Deep Learning Framework for Automated Body Composition Assessment.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Dosimetric impact of material misassignment in linear Boltzmann transport equation-based external beam radiotherapy dose calculation.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Beyond nodules: body composition as a biomarker for future lung cancer.European radiology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Body Composition Analysis for Cancer Patients Using Computed Tomographic Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- ODIASP: An Open-Source Software for Automated SMI Determination-Application to an Inpatient Population.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Article
- Predicting Primary Graft Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis Lung Transplantation Using Machine-Learning and CT Features.Clinical transplantation · 2025Article
- Predicting post-lung transplant survival in systemic sclerosis using CT-derived features from preoperative chest CT scans.European radiology · 2025Article
- Validation of musculoskeletal segmentation model with uncertainty estimation for bone and muscle assessment in hip-to-knee clinical CT images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Postoperative Lung Cancer Recurrence and Survival Using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression and Machine Learning.Cancers · 2024Article
- CT-Based Lung Size Matching in Delayed Chest Closure for Systemic Sclerosis Lung Transplantation.Clinical transplantation · 2024Article
- CT-Derived Features as Predictors of Clot Burden and Resolution.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Graphical modeling of causal factors associated with the postoperative survival of esophageal cancer subjects.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Automated detection and segmentation of pulmonary embolisms on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) using deep learning but without manual outlining.Medical image analysis · 2023Article
- Predicting left/right lung volumes, thoracic cavity volume, and heart volume from subject demographics to improve lung transplant.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Article
- CT-derived body composition associated with lung cancer recurrence after surgery.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- CT-Derived Body Composition Is a Predictor of Survival after Esophagectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Automatic deep learning method for third lumbar selection and body composition evaluation on CT scans of cancer patients.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a computer tool for automatic and simultaneous segmentation of five body tissues depicted on computed tomography (CT) scans: visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), skeletal muscle (SM), and bone.
methodsA cohort of 100 CT scans acquired on different subjects were collected from The Cancer Imaging Archive-50 whole-body positron emission tomography-CTs, 25 chest, and 25 abdominal. Five different body tissues (i.e., VAT, SAT, IMAT, SM, and bone) were manually annotated. A training-while-annotating strategy was used to improve the annotation efficiency. The 10-fold cross-validation method was used to develop and validate the performance of several convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including UNet, Recurrent Residual UNet (R2Unet), and UNet++. A grid-based three-dimensional patch sampling operation was used to train the CNN models. The CNN models were also trained and tested separately for each body tissue to see if they could achieve a better performance than segmenting them jointly. The paired sample t-test was used to statistically assess the performance differences among the involved CNN models
resultsWhen segmenting the five body tissues simultaneously, the Dice coefficients ranged from 0.826 to 0.840 for VAT, from 0.901 to 0.908 for SAT, from 0.574 to 0.611 for IMAT, from 0.874 to 0.889 for SM, and from 0.870 to 0.884 for bone, which were significantly higher than the Dice coefficients when segmenting the body tissues separately (p < 0.05), namely, from 0.744 to 0.819 for VAT, from 0.856 to 0.896 for SAT, from 0.433 to 0.590 for IMAT, from 0.838 to 0.871 for SM, and from 0.803 to 0.870 for bone.
conclusionThere were no significant differences among the CNN models in segmenting body tissues, but jointly segmenting body tissues achieved a better performance than segmenting them separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.