ReviewBiomedicines2022
A Historical Review of Military Medical Strategies for Fighting Infectious Diseases: From Battlefields to Global Health.
Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rabies in Military Personnel: Epidemiology, Clinical Challenges, and Strategies for Prevention and Management.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Gum Arabic-assisted green synthesis, characterization, antimicrobial, antibiofilm and antiparasitic activities of silver-selenium nanoparticles: Reaction mechanism determination.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and impact of travellers' diarrhoea differs during UK military training exercises in Kenya and Oman.BMJ military health · 2026Article
- Therapeutic advances in the fight against microbial resistance: innovative strategies and future challenges.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Adapting a commercial sample extraction protocol for biosafety level 3/4 compatible plasma metabolomics analysis.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025Article
- Advanced biopolymer nanocomposites for real-time biosurveillance and defense against antimicrobial resistance and viral threats.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Article
- Proteins and peptides as antigen candidates for the immunodiagnosis of hepatitis D.Amino acids · 2025Review
- Tetanus Vaccination in Agricultural Workers: A Retrospective Study on Seroprevalence over 10 Years.Vaccines · 2024Article
- In the Line of Duty: Militarizing African Epidemics.Global policy · 2024Article
- The Re-emergence of Diphtheria Amidst Multiple Outbreaks in Nigeria.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Have Diagnostics, Therapies, and Vaccines Made the Difference in the Pandemic Evolution of COVID-19 in Comparison with "Spanish Flu"?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Anthrax revisited: how assessing the unpredictable can improve biosecurity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells and MSCs-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Infectious Diseases: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Viral Diagnosis of Hepatitis B and Delta: What We Know and What Is Still Required? Specific Focus on Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Microorganisms · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The environmental conditions generated by war and characterized by poverty, undernutrition, stress, difficult access to safe water and food as well as lack of environmental and personal hygiene favor the spread of many infectious diseases. Epidemic typhus, plague, malaria, cholera, typhoid fever, hepatitis, tetanus, and smallpox have nearly constantly accompanied wars, frequently deeply conditioning the outcome of battles/wars more than weapons and military strategy. At the end of the nineteenth century, with the birth of bacteriology, military medical researchers in Germany, the United Kingdom, and France were active in discovering the etiological agents of some diseases and in developing preventive vaccines. Emil von Behring, Ronald Ross and Charles Laveran, who were or served as military physicians, won the first, the second, and the seventh Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for discovering passive anti-diphtheria/tetanus immunotherapy and for identifying mosquito Anopheline as a malaria vector and plasmodium as its etiological agent, respectively. Meanwhile, Major Walter Reed in the United States of America discovered the mosquito vector of yellow fever, thus paving the way for its prevention by vector control. In this work, the military relevance of some vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, as well as of biological weapons, and the military contributions to their control will be described. Currently, the civil-military medical collaboration is getting closer and becoming interdependent, from research and development for the prevention of infectious diseases to disasters and emergencies management, as recently demonstrated in Ebola and Zika outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic, even with the high biocontainment aeromedical evacuation, in a sort of global health diplomacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.