Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36010984›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Meta-Analysis Reveals Both the Promises and the Challenges of Clinical Metabolomics.

Heidi E Roth, Robert Powers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Reproducibility Crisis for Clinical Metabolomics Studies.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Applications of chromatographic methods in metabolomics: A review.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Best Practices in NMR Metabolomics: Current State.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2024
    Article
  16. Multiplatform untargeted metabolomics.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heidi E RothDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
Robert PowersDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9948-6837

Funding

Targeted mass spectrometry approaches to understand CART processing and recepter interactionsP20GM113126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI POWERS, ROBERT · 2016 to 2025
$20.8M
EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONC06RR015468 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI PAUL, PREM S · 2000 to 2000
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015468NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113126NIH HHS P20 GM113126NIH HHS RR015468-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical metabolomics is a rapidly expanding field focused on identifying molecular biomarkers to aid in the efficient diagnosis and treatment of human diseases. Variations in study design, metabolomics methodologies, and investigator protocols raise serious concerns about the accuracy and reproducibility of these potential biomarkers. The explosive growth of the field has led to the recent availability of numerous replicate clinical studies, which permits an evaluation of the consistency of biomarkers identified across multiple metabolomics projects. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third-leading cause of cancer-related death and has the lowest five-year survival rate primarily due to the lack of an early diagnosis and the limited treatment options. Accordingly, PDAC has been a popular target of clinical metabolomics studies. We compiled 24 PDAC metabolomics studies from the scientific literature for a detailed meta-analysis. A consistent identification across these multiple studies allowed for the validation of potential clinical biomarkers of PDAC while also highlighting variations in study protocols that may explain poor reproducibility. Our meta-analysis identified 10 metabolites that may serve as PDAC biomarkers and warrant further investigation. However, 87% of the 655 metabolites identified as potential biomarkers were identified in single studies. Differences in cohort size and demographics,

Indexed as

clinical metabolomicsmass spectrometrymeta-analysisNMRpancreatic cancer biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID36010984
PMCPMC9406125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.