Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36012421›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Looking into the Eyes-In Vitro Models for Ocular Research.

Krystyna Lieto, Rafał Skopek, Aneta Lewicka, Marta Stelmasiak, Emilia Klimaszewska, Arthur Zelent, Łukasz Szymański, Sławomir Lewicki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. 3D printed system usingInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Nanomedicine in Ophthalmology: From Bench to Bedside.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Cells · 2024
    Review
  12. An Assessment of the Ocular Toxicity of Two Major Sources of Environmental Exposure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. In Vitro Models of Tissue and Organ Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Krystyna LietoDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Kozielska 4, 01-163 Warsaw, Poland.
Rafał SkopekDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36A, 05-552 Jastrzębiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8669-3359
Aneta LewickaMilitary Centre of Preventive Medicine Modlin, 05-100 Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-0759
Marta StelmasiakDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, 26-600 Radom, Poland.
Emilia KlimaszewskaDepartment of Cosmetology, Faculty of Medical Sciences and Health Sciences, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, 26-600 Radom, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-5911
Arthur ZelentDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36A, 05-552 Jastrzębiec, Poland.
Łukasz SzymańskiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Postępu 36A, 05-552 Jastrzębiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-541X
Sławomir LewickiDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Kozielska 4, 01-163 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-0680
Kazimierz Pułaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PLWojskowy Instytut Higieny i Epidemiologii · PL

Funding

Polish National Centre for Research and Development DOB-1-6/1/PS/2014.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal research undoubtedly provides scientists with virtually unlimited data but inflicts pain and suffering on animals. Currently, legislators and scientists alike are promoting alternative in vitro approaches allowing for an accurate evaluation of processes occurring in the body without animal sacrifice. Historically, one of the most infamous animal tests is the Draize test, mainly performed on rabbits. Even though this test was considered the gold standard for around 50 years, the Draize test fails to mimic human response mainly due to human and rabbit eye physiological differences. Therefore, many alternative assays were developed to evaluate ocular toxicity and drug effectiveness accurately. Here we review recent achievements in tissue engineering of in vitro 2D, 2.5D, 3D, organoid and organ-on-chip ocular models, as well as in vivo and ex vivo models in terms of their advantages and limitations.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesEyeAnimalsBiological AssayHumansRabbits3D eye modelscorneal equivalentseye irritationin vitro eye modelsocular toxicitytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36012421
PMCPMC9409455
OpenAlexW4292070882

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.