Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36014535›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Widely Targeted Metabolomics Analysis of Soybean and Chickpea and Their Different Advantages and New Functional Compounds for Diabetes.

Pengshou Li, Yumiao Bian, Mengdan Li, Lingmei Li, Baosheng Zhao, Qixiang Ma, Yingchun Song, Jiuyi Li, Gangsheng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pengshou LiSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.
Yumiao BianSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.
Mengdan LiSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.
Lingmei LiSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.
Baosheng ZhaoBeijing Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Qixiang MaCancer Institute, Fudan University Cancer Hospital and Cancer Metabolism Laboratory, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yingchun SongSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.
Jiuyi LiSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.
Gangsheng ChenSchool of Food and Drug, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, China.

Funding

Key Scientific Research Projects of Henan Province Colleges and Universities 20B360016National Level Project Cultivation Fund of Luoyang Normal University 2018-PYJJ-007National Level Project Cultivation Fund of Luoyang Normal University 2019-PYJJ-013PhD Research Foundation of Luoyang Normal University 4600210Special Project of Henan Provincial Key Research, Development and Promotion (Science and Technology) 212102311104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soybean is widely used as a kind of bean for daily consumption. Chickpea is increasingly utilised because of its good healthcare function. At present, using chickpeas could have better results than soybeans in some areas. Previous studies of the two legumes focused on certain components and failed to fully reveal the differences between the two legumes. Thus, understanding the comprehensive similarities and differences between the two legumes is necessary to apply and develop these legumes effectively. In this study, we performed a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS-based widely targeted metabolomics analysis on two legumes. A total of 776 metabolites (including primary metabolites and secondary metabolites) were detected, which were divided into more than a dozen broad categories. The differential analysis of these metabolites showed that there were 480 metabolites with significant differences in relative contents between the two legumes. Compared with soybean, the expression of 374 metabolites of chickpea was down-regulated and that of 106 metabolites was up-regulated. The metabolic pathway analysis showed significant differences in the flavonoids biosynthesis, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, linoleic acid metabolism and alkaloid biosynthesis between the two legumes. The advantages and applicability of the two kinds of legumes were confirmed through the analysis of anti-diabetic components. Moreover, some novel compounds (with contents higher than that of soybean) with hypoglycaemic activity were found in chickpea. This study provides an important reference for the in-depth study and comparative application of soybean and chickpea.

Indexed as

CicerDiabetes MellitusFabaceaeGlycine maxMetabolomicsTandem Mass Spectrometrychickpeadiabetesdifferential metabolitessoybeanwidely targeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID36014535
PMCPMC9413387

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.