Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015363›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

New Strategies for Stroke Therapy: Nanoencapsulated Neuroglobin.

Santos Blanco, Esther Martínez-Lara, Eva Siles, María Ángeles Peinado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santos BlancoDepartment of Experimental Biology, Campus de Las Lagunillas s/n, University of Jaén, Building B3, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4686-5320
Esther Martínez-LaraDepartment of Experimental Biology, Campus de Las Lagunillas s/n, University of Jaén, Building B3, 23071 Jaen, Spain.
Eva SilesDepartment of Experimental Biology, Campus de Las Lagunillas s/n, University of Jaén, Building B3, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4192-7008
María Ángeles PeinadoDepartment of Experimental Biology, Campus de Las Lagunillas s/n, University of Jaén, Building B3, 23071 Jaen, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3136-0706

Funding

Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness BFU-2016-80316-RPrograma operativo FEDER Andalucía 2014-2020 1380831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a global health and socio-economic problem. However, no efficient preventive and/or palliative treatments have yet been found. Neuroglobin (Ngb) is an endogen neuroprotective protein, but it only exerts its beneficial action against stroke after increasing its basal levels. Therefore, its systemic administration appears to be an efficient therapy applicable to stroke and other neurodegenerative pathologies. Unfortunately, Ngb cannot cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), making its direct pharmacological use unfeasible. Thus, the association of Ngb with a drug delivery system (DDS), such as nanoparticles (NPs), appears to be a good strategy for overcoming this handicap. NPs are a type of DDS which efficiently transport Ngb and increase its bioavailability in the infarcted area. Hence, we previously built hyaluronate NPS linked to Ngb (Ngb-NPs) as a therapeutic tool against stroke. This nanoformulation induced an improvement of the cerebral infarct prognosis. However, this innovative therapy is still in development, and a more in-depth study focusing on its long-lasting neuroprotectant and neuroregenerative capabilities is needed. In short, this review aims to update the state-of-the-art of stroke therapies based on Ngb, paying special attention to the use of nanotechnological drug-delivering tools.

Indexed as

ischemiananoformulationneuroglobinstroke

Identifiers

PMID36015363
PMCPMC9412405

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.