Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015442›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Integrated Approach in Genomic Selection to Accelerate Genetic Gain in Sugarcane.

Karansher Singh Sandhu, Aalok Shiv, Gurleen Kaur, Mintu Ram Meena, Arun Kumar Raja, Krishnapriya Vengavasi, Ashutosh Kumar Mall, Sanjeev Kumar, Praveen Kumar Singh, Jyotsnendra Singh and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Identification ofAnimal biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Karansher Singh SandhuDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-2646
Aalok ShivDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-9232
Gurleen KaurHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Mintu Ram MeenaRegional Center, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Karnal 132001, India.
Arun Kumar RajaDivision of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, India.
Krishnapriya VengavasiDivision of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, India.
Ashutosh Kumar MallDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.
Sanjeev KumarDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.
Praveen Kumar SinghDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.
Jyotsnendra SinghDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.
Govind HemaprabhaDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, India.
Ashwini Dutt PathakDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.
Gopalareddy KrishnappaDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, India.
Sanjeev KumarDivision of Crop Improvement, ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6412-8749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marker-assisted selection (MAS) has been widely used in the last few decades in plant breeding programs for the mapping and introgression of genes for economically important traits, which has enabled the development of a number of superior cultivars in different crops. In sugarcane, which is the most important source for sugar and bioethanol, marker development work was initiated long ago; however, marker-assisted breeding in sugarcane has been lagging, mainly due to its large complex genome, high levels of polyploidy and heterozygosity, varied number of chromosomes, and use of low/medium-density markers. Genomic selection (GS) is a proven technology in animal breeding and has recently been incorporated in plant breeding programs. GS is a potential tool for the rapid selection of superior genotypes and accelerating breeding cycle. However, its full potential could be realized by an integrated approach combining high-throughput phenotyping, genotyping, machine learning, and speed breeding with genomic selection. For better understanding of GS integration, we comprehensively discuss the concept of genetic gain through the breeder's equation, GS methodology, prediction models, current status of GS in sugarcane, challenges of prediction accuracy, challenges of GS in sugarcane, integrated GS, high-throughput phenotyping (HTP), high-throughput genotyping (HTG), machine learning, and speed breeding followed by its prospective applications in sugarcane improvement.

Indexed as

breedingGEBVgenomic accuracygenomic selectionhigh-throughput genotypinghigh-throughput phenotypingmachine learningprediction modelsspeed breedingsugarcane

Identifiers

PMID36015442
PMCPMC9412483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.