Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015490›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Sodium Alginate/Chitosan Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering: The Influence of Its Three-Dimensional Material Preparation and the Use of Gold Nanoparticles.

Nohra E Beltran-Vargas, Eduardo Peña-Mercado, Concepción Sánchez-Gómez, Mario Garcia-Lorenzana, Juan-Carlos Ruiz, Izlia Arroyo-Maya, Sara Huerta-Yepez, José Campos-Terán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Biomimetic materials for medical applications.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nohra E Beltran-VargasProcess and Technology Department, Division of Natural Science and Engineering, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 05300, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7490-9127
Eduardo Peña-MercadoProcess and Technology Department, Division of Natural Science and Engineering, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 05300, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7942-9624
Concepción Sánchez-GómezResearch Laboratory of Developmental Biology and Experimental Teratogenesis, Children's Hospital of Mexico Federico Gomez, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 06720, Mexico.
Mario Garcia-LorenzanaDepartment of Reproduction Biology, Division of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 09340, Mexico.
Juan-Carlos RuizProcess and Technology Department, Division of Natural Science and Engineering, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 05300, Mexico.
Izlia Arroyo-MayaProcess and Technology Department, Division of Natural Science and Engineering, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 05300, Mexico.
Sara Huerta-YepezResearch Laboratory of Hematooncology, Children's Hospital of Mexico Federico Gomez, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 06720, Mexico.
José Campos-TeránProcess and Technology Department, Division of Natural Science and Engineering, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 05300, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7004-7224
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MXHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MX

Funding

Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez HIM/2020/059 SSA.1688.Secretaria de Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SECTEI) SECTEI/211/10357c19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural biopolymer scaffolds and conductive nanomaterials have been widely used in cardiac tissue engineering; however, there are still challenges in the scaffold fabrication, which include enhancing nutrient delivery, biocompatibility and properties that favor the growth, maturation and functionality of the generated tissue for therapeutic application. In the present work, different scaffolds prepared with sodium alginate and chitosan (alginate/chitosan) were fabricated with and without the addition of metal nanoparticles and how their fabrication affects cardiomyocyte growth was evaluated. The scaffolds (hydrogels) were dried by freeze drying using calcium gluconate as a crosslinking agent, and two types of metal nanoparticles were incorporated, gold (AuNp) and gold plus sodium alginate (AuNp+Alg). A physicochemical characterization of the scaffolds was carried out by swelling, degradation, permeability and infrared spectroscopy studies. The results show that the scaffolds obtained were highly porous (>90%) and hydrophilic, with swelling percentages of around 3000% and permeability of the order of 1 × 10−8 m2. In addition, the scaffolds proposed favored adhesion and spheroid formation, with cardiac markers expression such as tropomyosin, troponin I and cardiac myosin. The incorporation of AuNp+Alg increased cardiac protein expression and cell proliferation, thus demonstrating their potential use in cardiac tissue engineering.

Indexed as

alginatecardiac tissue engineeringchitosannanoparticlesscaffolds

Identifiers

PMID36015490
PMCPMC9414310
OpenAlexW4293516668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.