ReviewPolymers2022
Non-Viral Delivery of Gene Therapy to the Tendon.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biologic augmentation in rotator cuff repair: current evidence and future directions.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- NSUN2-engineered human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorate tendon injury by promoting DNM2 expression.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) empowering tendon regenerative therapies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Tendon Tissue Engineering: Pathophysiological Mechanism and Bioengineering Therapy of Tendinopathy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Polymers as Efficient Non-Viral Gene Delivery Vectors: The Role of the Chemical and Physical Architecture of Macromolecules.Polymers · 2024Review
- Application of BMP-2 and its gene delivery vehicles in dentistry.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- miRNAs contributing to the repair of tendon injury.Cell and tissue research · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The tendon, as a compact connective tissue, is difficult to treat after an acute laceration or chronic degeneration. Gene-based therapy is a highly efficient strategy for diverse diseases which has been increasingly applied in tendons in recent years. As technology improves by leaps and bounds, a wide variety of non-viral vectors have been manufactured that attempt to have high biosecurity and transfection efficiency, considered to be a promising treatment modality. In this review, we examine the unwanted biological barriers, the categories of applicable genes, and the introduction and comparison of non-viral vectors. We focus on lipid-based nanoparticles and polymer-based nanoparticles, differentiating between them based on their combination with diverse chemical modifications and scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.