ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Machine Learning for Predicting Hyperglycemic Cases Induced by PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning methods for predicting adverse drug events: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Drug Safety Across the Lifecycle and Decision Type: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Real-world safety assessment of MET-targeted therapies: a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FAERS database.Drugs in context · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Restoration as a Therapeutic Strategy to Halt Diabetes-Driven Atherosclerosis.Biology · 2025Review
- Identification of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Related Biomarkers in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Bioinformatics.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/L1), exhibited autoimmune-like disorders, and hyperglycemia was on the top of grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events. Machine learning is a model from past data for future data prediction. From post-marketing monitoring, we aimed to construct a machine learning algorithm to efficiently and rapidly predict hyperglycemic adverse reaction in patients using PD-1/L1 inhibitors. Methods: In original data downloaded from Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (US FAERS), a multivariate pattern classification of support vector machine (SVM) was used to construct a classifier to separate adverse hyperglycemic reaction patients. With correct core SVM function, a 10-fold 3-time cross validation optimized parameter value composition in model setup with R language software. Results: The SVM prediction model was set up from the number type/number optimization method, as well as the kernel and type of "rbf" and "nu-regression" composition. Two key values (nu and gamma) and case number displayed high adjusted Conclusion: We constructed an effective machine learning model based on compositions of exact kernels and computable parameters; the SVM prediction model can noninvasively and precisely predict hyperglycemic adverse drug reaction (ADR) in patients treated with PD-1/L1 inhibitors, which could greatly help clinical practitioners to identify high-risk patients and perform preventive measurements in time. Besides, this model setup process provided an analytic conception for promotion to other ADR prediction, such ADR information is vital for outcome improvement by identifying high-risk patients, and this machine learning algorithm can eventually add value to clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.